MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4246767804 · doi:10.25311/keskom.vol2.iss2.47

Faktor-Faktor yang Berhubungan dengan Pemberian ASI Eksklusif di Wilayah Kerja Puskesmas Rambah Hilir I Kabupaten Rokan Hulu Tahun 201

2013· article· id· W4246767804 on OpenAlexaff
Herlina Susmaneli

Bibliographic record

VenueJurnal kesehatan komunitas (Journal of community health) · 2013
Typearticle
Languageid
FieldMedicine
TopicPublic Health and Nutrition
Canadian institutionsWiLAN (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

National target for practice exclusive breastfeeding is 80 %. Riau Provincial health Department in 2010 reported that the scope of exclusive breastfeeding at 25.40%. Report Rokan Hulu District Health Office, Rambah Hilir I public health center was one of four health centers that target attainment is still low at 26.5%. This study aims to determine the relationship of maternal knowledge, maternal employment, information from health and family support to exclusivfeeding. The results obtained frequency of exclusive breastfeeding in the Rambah Hilir I public health center 35.8%, p value of knowledge capital variable maternal work, information from health and family support are 0.001, 0.590, 0.006 and 0.029. In conclusion, the frequency of exclusive breastfeeding in the Work Area Rambah Hilir I public health center at 35.8% in 2012, the variables associated with exclusive breastfeeding is the variable of maternal knowledge, information from health and family support, and variables that are not related to the variable job mother.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.028
Threshold uncertainty score0.095

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0030.001
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0280.005

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.034
GPT teacher head0.319
Teacher spread0.285 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations6
Published2013
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJurnal kesehatan komunitas (Journal of community health)Same topicPublic Health and NutritionFrench-language works237,207