Bibliographic record
Abstract
Sarah-Jane Mathier, North of the Color Line: Migration and Black Resistance in Canada, 1870–1955, reviewed by Jared Toney Adrienne Shadd, The Journey from Tollgate to Parkway: African Canadians in Hamilton, reviewed by Carmen Poole Edmund Jefferson Danziger Jr, Great Lakes Indian Accommodation and Resistance during the Early Reservation Years, 1850–1900, reviewed by Alison Norman Sarah Carter and Patricia McCormack, eds., Recollecting: Lives of Aboriginal Women of the Canadian Northwest and Borderlands, reviewed by Karine R. Duhamel Daniel C. Goodwin, Into Deep Waters: Evangelical Spirituality and Maritime Calvinistic Baptist Ministers 1790–1855, reviewed by Phyllis Airhart James Fitzgerald, What Disturbs Our Blood: A Son's Quest to Redeem the Past, reviewed by J.T.H. Connor Veronica Strong-Boag, Fostering Nation? Canada Confronts its History of Childhood Disadvantage, reviewed by Denyse Baillargeon Rosa García-Orellán, trans. Donald Murphy, Terranova: The Spanish Cod Fishery on the Grand Banks of Newfoundland in the Twentieth Century, reviewed by Miriam Wright Martin Thornton, Sir Robert Borden: Canada, reviewed by Craig Brown John C. Courtney and David E. Smith, eds., The Oxford Handbook of Canadian Politics, reviewed by Raymond B. Blake
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.006 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.004 | 0.004 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.008 | 0.004 |
| Open science | 0.003 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.003 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.417 | 0.378 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".