MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4246837335 · doi:10.1007/978-94-6351-218-3_34

Catching Fire

2017· book-chapter· en· W4246837335 on OpenAlexaff
Barbara Smith

Bibliographic record

VenueSensePublishers eBooks · 2017
Typebook-chapter
Languageen
FieldHealth Professions
TopicFilm in Education and Therapy
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsTheme (computing)Spring (device)AdvertisingEngineeringArchitectural engineeringPublic relationsPolitical scienceBusinessComputer scienceMechanical engineeringWorld Wide Web

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Piggy-backing off the popular Hunger Games movie, we decided to use the theme: ‘atching Fire’ to promote a focused campaign aimed at inspiring our students to prepare for the extensive DC-CAS testing in the spring. We created bulletin boards, ordered two expensive banners and integrated TenSquare’s ideas, in an effort to boost staff morale.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.116
Threshold uncertainty score0.389

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0030.002
Scholarly communication0.0030.004
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0020.004
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.1160.038

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.088
GPT teacher head0.404
Teacher spread0.316 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2017
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueSensePublishers eBooksSame topicFilm in Education and TherapyFrench-language works237,207