MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4246911015 · doi:10.1109/iccad.2005.1560102

Noise margin analysis for dynamic logic circuits

2005· article· en· W4246911015 on OpenAlexaff
M. Greenstreet

Bibliographic record

VenueICCAD-2005. IEEE/ACM International Conference on Computer-Aided Design, 2005. · 2005
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicLow-power high-performance VLSI design
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia
Fundersnot available
KeywordsDomino logicNoise marginComputer scienceElectronic circuitRobustness (evolution)Noise (video)Electronic engineeringLogic gateNoise immunityWaveformLogic synthesisLogic familyAlgorithmEngineeringElectrical engineeringTransistorArtificial intelligenceTelecommunicationsVoltage

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We consider the problem of noise margin analysis for dynamic logic circuits. Because such circuits operate in multiple phases, their noise immunity is also time varying. We formulate noise margin analysis as a non-linear optimization problem where we find the smallest disturbance waveform that results in a qualitative change in the behavior of the circuit. We present a practical method for solving these optimization problems based on deriving a sensitivity matrix for the small-signal response of the circuit. We use our approach to compare the robustness of static CMOS gates, self-resetting domino, and output prediction logic.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.901
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0020.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.050
GPT teacher head0.283
Teacher spread0.233 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations5
Published2005
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueICCAD-2005. IEEE/ACM International Conference on Computer-Aided Design, 2005.Same topicLow-power high-performance VLSI designFrench-language works237,207