MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4246912076 · doi:10.14740/jmc2414w

Platypnea-Orthodeoxia Syndrome With Atrial Septal Defect and Ectatic Aortic Root: A Case Report and Review of the Literature

2016· article· en· W4246912076 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Margarida Carvalho, Jorge Almeida, Gonçalo Rocha, Edite Braz, Joana Urbano, Raquel Mesquita, Sofia Moreira-Silva

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Medical Cases · 2016
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicCardiovascular and Diving-Related Complications
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicinePatent foramen ovaleCardiologyInternal medicineShunt (medical)Intracardiac injectionRetrograde perfusionHypoxemiaEctasiaPercutaneousAortaDescending aortaPerfusion

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Platypnea-orthodeoxia syndrome (POS) is a rare and underdiagnosed disease characterized by dyspnea in the upright position (platypnea) with simultaneous hypoxemia (orthodeoxia) that is relieved by recumbency. The physiopathological mechanisms involved are mediated by intracardiac shunts, pulmonary arteriovenous shunts or ventilation/perfusion mismatch. When POS is caused by a cardiac pathology, there is an anatomical (interatrial communication) and a functional component (as a dilated aorta or pneumectomy) working together to cause a right to left shunt without a constant right to left pressure gradient. Diagnosis is suspected through pulse oximetry verifying orthodeoxia. Confirmation usually is made by transesophageal echocardiography with bubble study to visualize the shunt. Percutaneous closure of the shunt is effective in most cases of cardiac POS. We report a case of an 87-year-old woman with POS related to a patent foramen ovale and an ectatic aorta followed by a review of the literature. J Med Cases. 2016;7(2):54-57 doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.14740/jmc2414w

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Case report · Consensus signal: Case report
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.119
Threshold uncertainty score0.523

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.286
Teacher spread0.273 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designCase report
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2016
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Medical CasesSame topicCardiovascular and Diving-Related ComplicationsFrench-language works237,207