MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4246923112 · doi:10.1385/1597450030

Arabidopsis Protocols

2006· book· en· W4246923112 on OpenAlexfundno aff
Salinas Julio, Sanchez-Serrano J. Jose

Bibliographic record

VenueHumana Press eBooks · 2006
Typebook
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicPlant Physiology and Cultivation Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersInstitute of GeneticsInstitute of Genetics and Developmental Biology, Chinese Academy of SciencesWageningen University and ResearchDirectorate for Biological SciencesWashington State UniversityImperial College LondonUniversität zu KölnPurdue UniversityInstitut National de la Recherche AgronomiqueRuhr-Universität BochumUniversiteit van AmsterdamUniversity of WarwickUniversidad Autónoma de MadridUniversity of Central FloridaUniversity of WashingtonInstituto Nacional de Investigación y Tecnología Agraria y AlimentariaCentre National de la Recherche ScientifiqueDepartment of Biotechnology, Government of West BengalChinese Academy of SciencesTexas Tech UniversityNorth Carolina State UniversityWake Forest UniversityUniversity of MissouriOhio State UniversityCentro Nacional de BiotecnologíaCarnegie Institution of WashingtonMassachusetts General Hospital
KeywordsArabidopsisArabidopsis thalianaOrganismBiologyComputational biologyGeneticsGene

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

For several decades, Arabidopsis thaliana has been the organism of choice in the laboratories of many plant geneticists, physiologists, developmental biologists, and biochemists around the world. Duri

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.126
Threshold uncertainty score0.420

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.002
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.001
Bibliometrics0.0040.003
Science and technology studies0.0030.001
Scholarly communication0.0020.001
Open science0.0040.002
Research integrity0.0010.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.1260.165

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.092
GPT teacher head0.264
Teacher spread0.171 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations50
Published2006
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueHumana Press eBooksSame topicPlant Physiology and Cultivation StudiesFrench-language works237,207