Multi‐resolution parametric synthesis of manipulative dynamic textures
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Dynamic textures are composed of spatially multi‐scale and temporally coherent visual signals. In this paper, we propose a novel approach for multi‐resolution parametric synthesis (MPS) of manipulative dynamic textures, including learning, analysis, and motion manipulation of layered feature spaces. The proposed approach separates the motions into different scales or frequencies, and the dynamic feature spaces are analyzed in modeling and then mapped to a global coordinate system to expose the multi‐scale structures. Our approach emphasizes the importance of fine‐scale data appearing more informative, while coarse signals are less focused. The synthesized dynamic textures using our MPS approach are strongly enhanced in dynamic appearance than the single‐scale LDS model, and also flexible in manipulating the decomposed feature spaces for creating different dynamic textures of the real world. Our experimental results showed the more faithful synthesized dynamic textures from input short videos, and their manipulative controls by simple editing of feature space basis, not only the whole video data. Copyright © 2008 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it