MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4246940364 · doi:10.3138/uram.25.2.71

Presenting this Issue

2002· article· en· W4246940364 on OpenAlexvenueno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueUltimate Reality and Meaning · 2002
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicEarly Modern Women Writers
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPhilosophyEpistemologySociology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

According to the 17 th Century Jesuit theologian Francisco Suarez, the question about God was identical with the question of Being, and was to be discussed by that branch of metaphysics known as natural theology.Revealed theology has divine revelation as its proper object.While it has much to say about the attributes of God and concerning our relationship to Ultimate Reality and Meaning, divine things rather than God's very self is the proper object of theology.This was not the case in 17 th Century philosophy.God is part of metaphysics in Suarez's system in three ways: (1) as a 'real being' or a substance; (2) as a first principle or cause; and (3) as a final cause.In other words, God, for Suarez, is the Being of Beings (or Ultimate Substance), First Cause, and Final Cause.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.012
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Editorial · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.278
Threshold uncertainty score0.930

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.012
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0030.002
Scholarly communication0.0100.006
Open science0.0020.004
Research integrity0.0120.007
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.2780.147

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.078
GPT teacher head0.255
Teacher spread0.177 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEditorial

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2002
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueUltimate Reality and MeaningSame topicEarly Modern Women WritersFrench-language works237,207