MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4246971983 · doi:10.1093/ajcl/avy012

Preface

2018· article· en· W4246971983 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueThe American Journal of Comparative Law · 2018
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicComparative and International Law Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPhilosophy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We take great pleasure in presenting this supplemental volume to the American Journal of Comparative Law (AJCL) containing the United States national reports to the Twentieth International Congress of Comparative Law, to be held in Fukuoka, Japan, from July 22 to 28, 2018, under the auspices of the International Academy of Comparative Law. The national reports have been prepared on the topics selected by the International Academy and respond to questionnaires promulgated by the general reporters appointed for each specific topic by the International Academy. We trust that these reports provide an interesting snapshot of U.S. law at the current time and a sound basis for comparison with other legal orders with respect to the important subjects the International Academy has chosen for study. Topics covered range from issues, such as climate change liability and data protection on the Internet, of particular twenty-first-century relevance, to classic concerns of property law and the commons. Other reports look at fundamental questions of governance, specifically, constitutional amendment and judicial deference to administrative agencies. Other reports address important matters of procedure—anti-suit injunctions and choice-of-court agreements—while yet other reports address significant regulatory concerns with corporate groups and the cruise-line industry. Yet another report examines a topic (the civil status of transsexual and transgender people) reflective of significant cultural change. Finally, as appropriate to a comparative law congress, other reports examine important examples of the globalization of law (reference to the UNIDROIT principles) and legal culture (bilingual legal education). In recognition of the fact that, for better or worse, electronic delivery of these reports is far more important than hard-copy print for most of those who read and use them, this supplemental issue of the AJCL is being delivered only in electronic format, not in a hard-copy version. Regular subscribers to the AJCL will already be used to accessing the reports in this fashion, and for the convenience of all those attending the Fukuoka Congress, it is expected that the reports will also be available during the Congress on the website for the American Society of Comparative Law. A collection of articles like this Supplement is the product of many hands, and we have a large number of people to thank. First and foremost, we thank the authors of these national reports for their hard work in producing the reports and for their cheerful patience in the face of our occasional hectoring with respect to deadlines, word limitations, and form requirements. Second, we thank the Articles Editor of the AJCL, Amber Lynch. Finally, we thank the Editors-in-Chief with whom we have worked, Professor Helge Dedek at McGill and Professor Franz H.G. Werro at Georgetown.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesScience and technology studies
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.926
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.004
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.070
GPT teacher head0.411
Teacher spread0.341 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it