MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4246976359 · doi:10.1158/1538-7445.sabcs18-568

Abstract 568: Decoding shared antigenic epitopes and their cognate TCR genes in melanoma TILs using a library of paired human cell-based pHLA multimers and artificial APCs

2019· article· en· W4246976359 on OpenAlexaff
Kenji Murata, Kayoko Saso, Linh T. Nguyen, Douglas Millar, Marcus O. Butler, Pamela S. Ohashi, Naoto Hirano

Bibliographic record

VenueImmunology · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicCAR-T cell therapy research
Canadian institutionsPrincess Margaret Cancer CentreUniversity Health Network
Fundersnot available
KeywordsT-cell receptorEpitopeDecoding methodsGeneComputer scienceComputational biologyAntigenT cellBiologyGeneticsAlgorithm

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

HLA-restricted T cell responses toward immunogenic peptides, whether mutated or non-mutated, can induce antitumor responses in patients with advanced cancer. The fact that potential non-mutated antigens are greater in number than mutated antigens by multiple orders of magnitude and the high polymorphism of HLA genes may have hampered comprehensive analyses of the specificity of antitumor T cell responses toward non-mutated antigens than mutated antigens. Unlike shared antigens, the vast majority of neoantigens are not shared and are unique to each patient. The elucidation of T cell epitopes derived from shared antigens may facilitate the robust development of an efficacious and safe adoptive T cell therapy that is readily available to a larger cohort of cancer patients. It is well established that melanoma tumor-infiltrating T lymphocytes (TILs) contain antitumor T cells that are specific for both non-mutated and mutated antigens. The adoptive transfer of TILs can induce sustained clinical responses in some patients with advanced melanoma. However, a precise and extensive understanding of the shared antigen targets of TILs has been lacking. In this study, TILs were isolated from 8 metastatic melanoma patients, polyclonally expanded in vitro, and their shared antigen specificities for all 45 (25 different) class I alleles were examined. The combination of structure-based analysis using human cell-based peptide/HLA (pHLA) multimers and functional analysis using artificial antigen-presenting cells (APCs) were used to determine antigen-specific T cell responses. We were able to determine the specificity of 12.2 ± 7.2% (mean ± SD, max 25.8%, min 4.6%) of CD8+ T cells in an expanded TIL culture toward 3.0 ± 1.8 (mean ± SD, max 6, min 1) previously known or novel peptides derived from shared antigens. Furthermore, we isolated a number of cognate TCR genes with potent tumor reactivity from the CD8+ T cells. The strategy employed in this study using a library of paired human cell-based pHLA multimers and artificial APCs has enabled us to decipher the antigen specificity of tumor-specific T cells for any given HLA class I allele, regardless of allele frequency and for an infinite number of peptides. It has also allowed us to build a large database of class I-restricted peptides and cognate tumor-reactive TCR genes at an unprecedented scale. This database will be a valuable tool in defining the immune response at the level of each individual cancer patient with precision as well as the identification and validation of biomarkers to aid in patient-based selection of a cancer immunotherapy regimen. Furthermore, this database will help the robust development of novel cancer vaccines and TCR gene therapies for patients with a low mutation burden.Citation Format: Kenji Murata, Kayoko Saso, Linh T. Nguyen, Douglas Millar, Marcus O. Butler, Pamela S. Ohashi, Naoto Hirano. Decoding shared antigenic epitopes and their cognate TCR genes in melanoma TILs using a library of paired human cell-based pHLA multimers and artificial APCs [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2019; 2019 Mar 29-Apr 3; Atlanta, GA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2019;79(13 Suppl):Abstract nr 568.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.123
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.043
GPT teacher head0.301
Teacher spread0.257 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2019
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueImmunologySame topicCAR-T cell therapy researchFrench-language works237,207