MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Editorial

2003· editorial· en· W4247055942 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Colin R. Harwood

Bibliographic record

VenueLetters in Applied Microbiology · 2003
Typeeditorial
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicMicrobial Community Ecology and Physiology
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSurpriseComputer scienceWorld Wide WebLibrary sciencePleasureIdentifierInclusion (mineral)Psychology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The previous year, 2003, saw the introduction of the online submission and review for Letters in Applied Microbiology. Much to my surprise (and pleasure), the uptake by authors was immediate and enthusiastic, and more than 95% of manuscripts were handled electronically. In the vast majority of cases, there was a corresponding reduction in the time taken from submission to publication. In future all submissions to the Journal will be via Manuscript Central (http://appliedmicrobiology.manuscriptcentral.com). Electronic submission coincided with a>30% increase in the rate of submission, with a notable and very welcome increase in submissions from the USA and the Far East. August saw the introduction of OnlineEarly, an enhancement to the Blackwell Synergy service where fully corrected articles are published online, prior to their inclusion in the printed edition. OnlineEarly is a truly ‘finished article’ service with fully functional searchable articles in HTML and downloadable PDF formats. Although OnlineEarly articles do not have bibliographic information associated with them (i.e. Vol./Issue numbers, page ranges), they can still be cited by means of their DOI (Digital Object Identifier). Because the DOI remains with the paper, references prior to full publication will still allow readers to access the article. Coupled with online submission of manuscripts, the introduction of OnlineEarly makes the Journal even more attractive to authors and readers alike. I would like to thank the Editors and Reviewers for all their hard work over the last year, without which it would not have been possible to produce the journal. During 2003 there have been a number of changes in the membership of the Editorial Board. I would like to take this opportunity to welcome new members and hope that they enjoy their time on the Board, and also to express my gratitude to those leaving after many years of service. I would like to record my thanks to the journal staff at Blackwell Publishing for their work over the year. Particular thanks go to our Editorial Assistant, Hannah Berry, who took over as from Kevin Wright, and to our Production Editor, Claire Terris, who will be returning home to Australia in the New Year. Finally, I am pleased to report that Dr Jean-Yves Maillard, from the University of Brighton, will take over as Editor in Chief of Letters in Applied Microbiology in the summer of 2004. Dr Maillard has many years of experience as an Editor and is well qualified to oversee the continued development of the Journal. Dr Michael Barrett, University of Glasgow, Scotland, UK Dr Paul Bishop, North Carolina State University, USA Dr Paul Gale, WRc-NSF, UK Dr John Hammond, Brewing Research International, UK Dr Marcelle Holsters, University of Gent, Belgium Dr Keith Jones, University of Lancaster, UK Dr Oscar Kuipers, University of Groningen, the Netherlands Dr Bernard Mackey, University of Reading, UK Dr Naresh Magan, Cranfield University, UK Prof Valerie Marshall, University of Huddersfield, UK Dr Feilim Maxwell, GlaxoSmithKline, UK Dr William Page, University of Alberta, Canada Dr Malcolm Paynter, Clemson University, USA Dr Joy Perkins, University of Huddersfield, UK Dr Eunice Allan, University of Aberdeen, Scotland, UK Dr Chris Boulton, Coors Brewers, UK Prof Donald Cowan, University of the Western Cape, South Africa Dr Jarmila Glassey, University of Newcastle, UK Dr Peter Gowland, Staffordshire University, UK Dr Jeroen Hugenholtz, NIZO Food Research, the Netherlands Dr John Lisle, USGS, USA Dr Steve Smith, University of Aston, UK Dr Colin Stewart, Rowett Research Institute, Scotland, UK 11 December 2003

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Research integrity, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesResearch integrity, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Editorial · Consensus signal: Editorial
Teacher disagreement score0.308
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0030.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0060.003

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.003
GPT teacher head0.196
Teacher spread0.193 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEditorial

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2003
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueLetters in Applied MicrobiologySame topicMicrobial Community Ecology and PhysiologyFrench-language works237,207