MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4247070647 · doi:10.1002/9781118430873.est0171

<scp>H</scp> ughes, <scp>E</scp> verett <scp>C</scp>

2017· other· en· W4247070647 on OpenAlexaffabout
J. I. Bakker

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Wiley-Blackwell Encyclopedia of Social Theory · 2017
Typeother
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicQualitative Research Methods and Ethics
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Guelph
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSociologyStyle (visual arts)Sociological theoryMedia studiesSocial scienceArt

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Everett C. Hughes (1897–1983), a minister's son from Ohio, was a major figure in the social sciences. He contributed to the Chicago School of Sociology and influenced many graduate students. He also taught at McGill and Brandeis Universities and Boston College. He never wrote a systematic, general sociology or sociological theory text, but his work was insightful and contained pearls of wisdom about social relations. He was more of a fox than a hedgehog. An early essay on “Good People and Dirty Work” had an impact. Men and Their Work was also significant. He is best known for his influence on the sociology of medicine and of race. He influenced Erving Goffman's approach to research and style of writing.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.027
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.053
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMetaresearch, Meta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Open science, Research integrity, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Research integrity, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.069
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0270.053
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0040.014
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0060.001
Research integrity0.0030.004
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.057
GPT teacher head0.396
Teacher spread0.339 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2017
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Wiley-Blackwell Encyclopedia of Social TheorySame topicQualitative Research Methods and EthicsFrench-language works237,207