The time course of the motoneurone afterhyperpolarization is related to motor unit twitch speed in human skeletal muscle
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The relationship between the electrophysiological properties of motoneurones and their muscle units has been established in animal models. A functionally significant relationship exists whereby motoneurones with long post-spike afterhyperpolarizations (AHPs) innervate slow contracting muscle units. The purpose of this study was to determine whether the time course of the AHP as measured by its time constant is associated with the contractile properties of its muscle unit in humans. Using an intramuscular fine wire electrode, 46 motor units were recorded in eight subjects as they held a low force contraction of the first dorsal interosseus muscle for approximately 10 min. By applying a recently validated transform to the interspike interval histogram, the mean voltage versus time trajectory of the motoneurone AHP was determined. Spike-triggered averaging was used to extract the muscle unit twitch from the whole muscle force with strict control over force variability and motor unit discharge rate (interspike intervals between 120 and 200 ms). The AHP time constant was positively correlated to the time to half-force decay (ρ = 0.36, P < 0.05) and twitch duration (ρ = 0.57, P < 0.001); however, time to peak force failed to reach significance (ρ = 0.27, P < 0.07). These results suggest that a similar functional relationship exists in humans between the motoneurone AHP and the muscle unit contractile properties.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".