MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4247078192 · doi:10.1093/ajhp/62.4.438a

The Mind of Norman Bethune

2005· article· en· W4247078192 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Jun Yan

Bibliographic record

VenueAmerican Journal of Health-System Pharmacy · 2005
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPsychology
TopicAcademic and Historical Perspectives in Psychology
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsEulogyBiographyChinaMemoirCommunismHistoryReading (process)Art historyMedia studiesClassicsLiteratureLawArtSociologyPoliticsPolitical science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Norman Bethune, a Canadian surgeon who died in 1939 in a remote village in China during World War II, had a most unusual kind of fame. Virtually unknown in his home country of Cana-da, Bethune’s name is known to almost every Chinese schoolchild; his eulogy written by Mao Tsetung is mandatory reading in textbooks. In China, there are hospitals bearing his name and museums dedicated to his life and career as a field surgeon who worked for the Chinese Communist army in the Sino–Japanese war. He had acquired celebrity after death in a country far from his own, where he did not even speak the language. Roderick Stewart’s book, The Mind of Norman Bethune, reveals a man who was extraordinary, colorful, and curious. The bulk of Stewart’s book is an extensive collection of Bethune’s letters, speeches, artwork, creative writing, and photographs, organized by a chronological sketch of his life. This book was not meant to be a biography, which the same author had already published, but rather a window for the reader to peer into the mind of the man.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.042
Threshold uncertainty score0.083

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0060.005
Scholarly communication0.0030.003
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0010.004
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.031
GPT teacher head0.415
Teacher spread0.384 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2005
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAmerican Journal of Health-System PharmacySame topicAcademic and Historical Perspectives in PsychologyFrench-language works237,207