MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4247085377 · doi:10.32920/ryerson.14647785

Smart Transit Dynamic Optimization and Informatics

2021· preprint· en· W4247085377 on OpenAlexaff
Hamid Reza Sabarshad

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typepreprint
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicTransportation and Mobility Innovations
Canadian institutionsToronto Metropolitan University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComputer scienceDynamic pricingQueueComponent (thermodynamics)Queueing theoryOperations researchProcess (computing)Scheduling (production processes)Real-time computingMathematical optimizationEconomicsComputer networkEngineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

With the popularity of Big Data and urban informatics, there is increasing interest in ways to use real time data to improve transportation system operations. In many real-wold applications, demand is revealed dynamically over time, and consequently the routes are determined dynamically as well. In this thesis, contributions are made to several key components of a “smart” transit system framework where dynamic operations are driven by real time information. The first component is in dynamic routing and pricing of a fleet of vehicles. A new dynamic dial-a-ride policy is introduced that features non-myopic pricing based on optimal tolling of queues to fit with the multi-server queueing approximation method. By including social optimal pricing, the social welfare of the resulting system outperforms a pricing policy based on the marginal cost increase of a passenger over a range of test instances. In the examples tested, improvements in social welfare of the non-myopic pricing over the myopic pricing were in the 20% - 31% range. The second component is in the informatics. Effective dynamic optimization of a system (routing, scheduling, fare setting, etc.) requires effective short term prediction of traveler/customer arrival using real-time data. Several recent methods for arrival process prediction, both offline and online, are investigated using real taxi data from New York. An experiment is conducted using the same data set to draw comparisons for arrival process modeling, suggesting that the temporal seasonal factors method from Ihlers et al. (2006) is more effective as an offline approach and the IntGARCH method from Matteson et al. (2011) is more effective as an online approach. The third component investigated is in the prepositioning of idle vehicles. Vehicles that are positioned at locations that take into account future demand can lead to reduced wait times for passengers and improved level of service. A dynamic relocation model is proposed that includes queueing delay to approximate the congestion effect of future demand. A linear problem is formulated based on Marianov and Serra’s (2002) work. By varying customer arrivals, the approach provides a new managerial tool to find the optimal service level.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.814
Threshold uncertainty score0.509

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.006
GPT teacher head0.203
Teacher spread0.197 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations11
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicTransportation and Mobility InnovationsFrench-language works237,207