Should peritoneal dialysis catheters be removed at the time of kidney transplantation?
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Background: Delayed graft function (DGF) following transplantationnecessitates support in the form of hemodialyis (HD) orperitoneal dialysis (PD). However, post-transplant PD-related complicationand failure rates are unknown.Methods: We studies patients who were on PD at the time of kidneytransplantation over a 4-year period at two separate institutions.Results: Of the 137 PD patients, 19 had their catheters removedat the time of transplant. Of the remaining 118 patients, 89% hadimmediate graft function. PD-related complications in this groupincluded peritonitis (n=5), catheter-related infections (n=2) andemergency laparotomy (n=1). Of the 15 patients requiring posttransplantPD, 33% developed peritonitis and 20% had fluid-leaksnecessitating HD. Overall, leaving a PD catheter in situ post- transplantationis associated with 7% rate of peritonitis versus 0% ifremoved (p < 0.05).Conclusions: PD catheter removal should be considered at thetime of renal transplantation, as postoperative PD-related failure/complication rates are high.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.014 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".