Bibliographic record
Abstract
The aim of root canal treatment is to eliminate bacteria from the infected root canal and to prevent reinfection. Biomechanical cleaning and shaping greatly reduces the number of bacteria. Nevertheless, due to anatomical complexity of the root canal system, residues and bacteria cannot be removed completely. Therefore, various substances have been used during canal preparation to remove debris, necrotic tissue, bacteria and smear layer. The most common irrigant of choice is sodium hypochlorite (NaOCI): it is an effective antimicrobial agent and tissue solvent. However, NaOCI can be toxic. Chlorhexidine gluconate (CHX) is a broad-spectrum antimicrobial agent. As a root canal irrigant and intracanal medicament, CHX has an antibacterial efficacy comparable to that of NaOCI, and is effective against resistant bacterial strains. CHX may result in residual antimicrobial activity of the dentine surface after prolonged exposure of the root canal to CHX. CHX also has a low grade of toxicity. In this review CHX will be discussed in detail.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.004 | 0.006 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".