Abstract O.59: Fate of Kawasaki disease giant coronary aneurysm: Analysis of the last 10 years nationwide survey in Japan
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Background and Objective: Long term prognosis of Kawasaki disease (KD) with giant aneurysm is not yet well understood. We conducted a nationwide survey of KD with giant aneurysm for recent 10 years, and analyzed cardiac events of those patients. Methods: Nationwide epidemiological survey of KD has been conducted every 2 years since 1970 in Japan. We performed questionnaire survey based on 16th - 21th (1999 - 2010) nationwide epidemiological data. Results: We send questioners to 275 facilities asking about 415 patients who were reported to have giant aneurysm (>=8mm), and collected the data of 334 patients (80.5%). We excluded 84 non-giant aneurysm patients and 36 duplicated cases and difined finally 214 patients. Out of 214 patients, 13 deaths and 32 AMIs were described (6.1% and 15.0%, respectively). The first AMI attack was mostly reported within a few months from KD onset (medium 5 months (0-85 months)). AMI was occurred one time in 26 patients, and two times in 6 cases. Myocardial ischemia was observed in 80% of AMI patients, and 12 patients were received coronary artery bypass graft. Thirteen patients were reported to be dead (medium 1 month (0-23 months) from KD onset). There were 6 cardiac deaths within 1 month from KD onset (5: rupture of aneurysm, 1: AMI). The others were all caused by AMI except for 2 accidental death. Four out of 6 AMI deaths were caused by the first AMI attack. For the remaining 2 AMI deaths, the period from the first AMI to second fatal AMI was 1 month and 6 month, respectively. There were no death reported byond 2 years from KD onset. Conclusion: AMI and cardiac death of KD with giant aneurysm occurred mostly in early phase of KD onset. Coronary rupture occurs within a month after onset, and 84% AMI and all AMI death occurs within 2 years after onset. Patients survival become promising after 2 years from onset. These evidences indicate that therapeutic strategy up to 2 years after onset is extremely important for prognosis of KD with giant aneurysm.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".