Abstracts from the 4th Annual Student Medical Summit
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Anonymized data of a random sample of 10% of all children aged 1-5 who had general anaesthesia in 2018 in Cork University Hospital was provided by the Hospital Inpatient Enquiry.Top performance indicators as set out by the PAMoC were collected and compared to international standards.These included fasting times, post-operative nausea/vomiting or unplanned admission after day-case surgery.Results 16 departments responded to the survey (response rate 57%), representing both model 3 and model 4 hospitals.Overall, 93.75% felt the model of care had not meaningfully changed or influenced practice in their department.Only 50% of hospitals have a lead paediatric anaesthesiologist and of these, only 31% lead paediatric anaesthesiologists undertake a paediatric list weekly.In terms of quality improvement, 12 (75%) departments are not routinely recording performance indicators for paediatric anaesthesia.65 patients were included in the audit.Mean fasting time for this sample was 12 hours.Post-operative nausea and vomiting was identified in 9.7% of the sample.The unplanned admission rate was 18%.In comparison to other specialities, children undergoing orthopaedic surgery were significantly more likely to have an unplanned admission (p< 0.003).73% of unplanned admissions were orthopaedic cases. ConclusionsThis study indicates the PAMoC has not been effectively implemented in non-specialist Irish public hospitals, with comparatively high fasting times [2] and unplanned admissions [3] highlighting an area for future study and quality improvement to deliver the best quality anaesthesia care for children in Ireland
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".