MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4247165525 · doi:10.3905/jsf.2002.320263

Structuring and Financing International BOO/BOT Desalination Projects

2002· article· en· W4247165525 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

Venue˜The œjournal of structured finance · 2002
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBusiness, Management and Accounting
TopicPublic-Private Partnership Projects
Canadian institutionsPricewaterhouseCoopers (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsStructuringBusinessDesalinationFinanceBiology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Research shows that there are currently up to US$5 billion worth of desalination contracts in development in the Middle East and Mediterranean region alone. Desalination projects historically have been heavily funded from local and regional players. However, this volume of financing requirement will necessitate enlarging the lender base. That in turn may require a more typical BOO/BOT structure with which international project finance lenders have experience, understanding, and comfort. Key to implementing a bankable commercial structure will be the off-take agreement and the level of risks passed to the project, and consequently to the investors, including the banks. With the right public/private contractual mix, and given the limited but proven bankability of these projects, it is hoped that there will be an increase in private-sector investment in desalination projects that will come to fruition under BOO/BOT structures, thus benefiting all the relevant stakeholders.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.567
Threshold uncertainty score0.580

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.002
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.027
GPT teacher head0.227
Teacher spread0.200 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it