MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4247181689 · doi:10.1017/s146722270000149x

ESO volume 14 issue 3 Cover and Front matter

2013· article· en· W4247181689 on OpenAlexfundno aff
Andrew Popp, Francesca Polese, Sharon Murphy, Richard H Weiner, Carol Lockman, Per H. Hansen, Mary Yeager, Kenneth Lipartito, Roger Horowitz, Barbara Hahn, Julia Ott, Martha L. Olney, Marcelo Bucheli, David F. Weiman, Anna Spadavecchia, Gerben Bakker, Mark A. Wilson, Marc Levinson, Margaret C. Levenstein

Bibliographic record

VenueEnterprise & Society · 2013
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicAstronomy and Astrophysical Research
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersUniversity of Colorado DenverUniversity of California, Los AngelesUniversité de GenèveCentre National de la Recherche ScientifiqueUniversity of OxfordYork UniversityUniversità BocconiHagley Museum and LibraryFlorida International UniversityUniversity of Southern CaliforniaHarvard Business SchoolUniversity of MissouriGeorgia Institute of TechnologyMassachusetts Institute of TechnologyUniversitetet i Bergen
KeywordsFront coverCover (algebra)Front (military)Volume (thermodynamics)Action (physics)Content (measure theory)Environmental scienceComputer scienceEngineeringMechanical engineeringPhysicsMathematicsThermodynamics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

aspects of the research, writing, and teaching of business history and of the environment in which business operates.Its membership is international and representative of economists, historians, and those in allied fields, such as history of technology, accounting, labor, transportation, and government, who focus on business history as a means of understanding their subjects.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.198
Threshold uncertainty score0.283

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.002
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0050.002
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0020.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.8020.700

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.004
GPT teacher head0.231
Teacher spread0.227 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; the direct Gemma label and the distilled Codex classifier agree on what is shown here.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2013
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueEnterprise & SocietySame topicAstronomy and Astrophysical ResearchFrench-language works237,207