MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4247251240 · doi:10.1002/9781118430873.est0111

Ethnic Mosaic

2017· other· en· W4247251240 on OpenAlexaff
Leo Driedger

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Wiley-Blackwell Encyclopedia of Social Theory · 2017
Typeother
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicPublic Spaces through Art
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Manitoba
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMosaicEthnic groupAnalogyPluralVariety (cybernetics)SociologyDiversity (politics)Boundary (topology)GeographyAnthropologyComputer scienceEpistemologyLinguisticsMathematicsArtificial intelligencePhilosophy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The analogy of the mosaic is useful in answering three questions: How are the tiles in the mosaic distributed? Do the tiles all have equal influence? What is the nature of each of the tiles in the total design? Ethnic mosaic applies this to the variety of ethnic and cultural groups in plural societies. Some think the model of mosaic is too boundary oriented and have suggested that we need to focus more on ethnic networks and social ties to link the diversity of ethnic groups in order to encourage cooperation and democratic working together.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.004
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.159
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0040.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.005
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0030.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0110.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.023
GPT teacher head0.328
Teacher spread0.305 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2017
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Wiley-Blackwell Encyclopedia of Social TheorySame topicPublic Spaces through ArtFrench-language works237,207