MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4247295545 · doi:10.1016/s0969-4765(08)70141-3

L-1 revenue soars

2008· article· en· W4247295545 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueBiometric Technology Today · 2008
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBusiness, Management and Accounting
TopicBusiness Strategy and Innovation
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsQuarter (Canadian coin)RevenueBusinessAgricultural economicsCommerceFinanceEconomicsGeographyArchaeology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

L-1 Identity Solutions has announced its financial results for the first quarter ended 31 March 2008. Revenue for the first quarter of 2008 was US$116.0 million compared to US$70.0 million in the first quarter of 2007, an increase of US$46.0 million or 66%. The company also reported a first quarter net loss of US$1.9 million, or US$0.03 per diluted share, compared to a net loss of US$8.8 million, or US$0.12 per diluted share in the first quarter of 2007.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.010
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.303
Threshold uncertainty score0.994

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.010
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0030.001
Science and technology studies0.0020.001
Scholarly communication0.0090.003
Open science0.0020.003
Research integrity0.0020.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.3030.228

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.028
GPT teacher head0.222
Teacher spread0.194 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2008
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueBiometric Technology TodaySame topicBusiness Strategy and InnovationFrench-language works237,207