Bibliographic record
Abstract
Citation (2013), "List of Contributors", Beghin, J.C. (Ed.) Nontariff Measures with Market Imperfections: Trade and Welfare Implications (Frontiers of Economics and Globalization, Vol. 12), Emerald Group Publishing Limited, Bingley, pp. ix-x. https://doi.org/10.1108/S1574-8715(2013)0000012003 Publisher: Emerald Group Publishing Limited Copyright © 2013, Emerald Group Publishing Limited Book Chapters Nontariff Measures with Market Imperfections: Trade and Welfare Implications Frontiers of Economics and Globalization Frontiers of Economics and Globalization Copyright Page About the Series: Frontiers of Economics and Globalization About the Editor List of Contributors Introduction and Main Findings A Cost–Benefit Approach for the Assessment of Nontariff Measures in International Trade The Economics and Potential Protectionism of Food Safety Standards and Inspections: An Application to the U.S. Shrimp Market 3 How to Promote Quality Perception: Brand Advertising or Geographical Indication? 4 Transparency in Nontariff Measures: Effects on Agricultural Trade 5 Choosing the Best Model in the Presence of Zero Trade: A Fish Product Analysis 6 Investigating the Impact of MRL Standards’ Similarity on Trade 7 The Role of EU Harmonization in Explaining the Export-Productivity Premium of Food Processing Firms 8 Private Food Standards and Firm-Level Trade Effects: A Dynamic Analysis of the Peruvian Asparagus Export Sector 9 Trade Effects of Private and Public European Food Safety Standards on Horticultural Imports from Kenya 10 Stringent Maximum Residue Limits, Protectionism, and Competitiveness: The Cases of the US and Canada 11 The Participation of Smallholder Farmers in High-Value Export Markets Governed by Standards: The Role of Exporter Procurement Practices 12 Mutual Recognition of Accreditation: Does it Matter to Trade? Evidence from the Food, Beverage, and Tobacco Industry
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".