Pathways from rebellion: Rebel-party configurations in Côte d’Ivoire and Burundi
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
African Affairs, 1–23, https://doi.org/10.1093/afraf/adx042 Due to an error, this article was originally published without including some minor corrections requested by the authors. The article has since been updated to include those corrections. OUP would like to apologise for this error. *Jeremy Speight ([email protected]) is an Assistant Professor of Political Science at the University of Alaska Fairbanks. Katrin Wittig ([email protected]) holds a PhD in Political Science from the Université de Montréal. The authors presented earlier versions of this article in 2015 at the Canadian Political Science Association in Ottawa, Canada and at the European Conference on African Studies in Paris, France. The authors would like to thank Marie-Eve Desrosiers, Mark Harding, Andreas Mehler, Marie-Joëlle Zahar, the African Affairs editors as well as two anonymous reviewers for their extremely helpful feedback. The authors also gratefully acknowledge the financial support from the Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council Canada and the Pierre Elliot Trudeau Foundation.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it