Bibliographic record
Abstract
Dr Chan-Yip is a member of the Caring for Kids New to Canada Editorial Board To the Editor; In their recent article, Caring for Kids New to Canada (1), Drs Charles Hui and Tony Barozzino call on us to better understand the distinctive needs of immigrant and refugee children in our care. I would like to draw attention to iron deficiency anemia (IDA) as a health problem prevalent among certain racial/ethnic groups in Canada and other developed countries (2–4). Understanding the cultural and psychosocial risk factors linked to such ethnic differences can facilitate health professionals’ implementation of IDA prevention strategies (5). Infant feeding and toddler eating habits are developmental processes strongly influenced by the mother’s and other caregivers’ traditional beliefs and knowledge of optimal nutrition (6). For example, cultural practice has been associated with feeding infants southeast Asian diets low in iron bioavailability (7). Contributing psychosocial risk factors for iron deficiency among young children may include food insecurity (8), or maternal fatigue and emotional stress from child-caring leading to excessive bottle feeding of whole cow's milk or prolonged breast feeding (6), which may subsequently lead to the development of both nursing caries and IDA. These risk factors are of particular relevance among recent refugee and immigrant families adapting to life in a new country (1). Having observed a high prevalence of IDA among young Chinese children in my Montreal (Quebec) practice (6), I led a randomized controlled trial in the 1980s (9) to identify potential contributing risk factors, including feeding rice congee as a complementary food, prolonged breastfeeding and fecal blood loss associated with whole cow milk feeding. Periodic enquiry regarding nutritional practice at health visits and the use of a three-day dietary record provided by mothers at one year of age were effective in identifying risk factors for iron deficiency, including misunderstanding/noncompliance with nutrition advice. Selective screening for iron deficiency with blood tests is indicated when risk factors are identified (10). Physicians should also be vigilant about following up on blood test results to ensure that patients with iron deficiency receive timely iron replacement therapy (10). Cultural and psychosocial influences leading to suboptimal nutrition practices can be overcome with a comprehensive dietary review using a language-appropriate Canada Food Guide and WHO Growth Standard. Such routines have the potential to prevent not only nutrient deficiency, but also nursing caries (6), overweight (3,11) and other eating problems in young children. Nutrition counselling for at-risk ethnic groups should include discussion of infant feeding with iron-fortified cereals and/or pureed meat rather than home-prepared cereals. A recent randomized controlled trial investigating the introduction of complementary foods to infants at four months of age versus six months of age demonstrated significantly higher serum ferritin levels in the former group (12). Earlier introduction may facilitate infant adaptation to the taste and texture of complementary foods, thus ensuring optimum dietary iron consumption by six months of age. Finally, prevention of iron deficiency of nutritional origin in infants and toddlers requires a multifaceted approach including public health policy, and community resources to promote prenatal education regarding iron nutrition to expectant mothers and to identify risk factors for nutrient deficiency in young children (2,4). Development and evaluation of culturally effective prevention strategies for immigrant and refugee families are urgently needed. I encourage every health professional to consult the Caring for Kids New to Canada e-book, an excellent resource for culturally appropriate health care. Here are some relevant chapters: Iron Deficiency and Iron Deficiency Anemia: www.kidsnewtocanada.ca/conditions/iron How Culture Influences Health: www.kidsnewtocanada.ca/culture/influence Barriers and Facilitators to Health Care for Newcomers: www.kidsnewtocanada.ca/care/barriers Cultural Competence for Child and Youth Health Professionals: www.kidsnewtocanada.ca/culture/competence
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.022 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.005 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.004 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.036 | 0.024 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.015 | 0.009 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".