Bibliographic record
Abstract
Michael Asch, On Being Here to Stay: Treaties and Aboriginal Rights in Canada, reviewed by J.R. Miller Gregory M.W. Kennedy, Something of a Peasant Paradise?: Comparing Rural Societies in Acadie and the Loudunais, 1604–1755, reviewed by Ronald Rudin Ted Binnema, Enlightened Zeal: The Hudson's Bay Company and Scientific Networks, 1670–1870, reviewed by Krista Barclay Scott Jamieson and Anne Thareau, trans. and eds., French Visitors to Newfoundland: An Anthology of Nineteenth-Century Travel Writing, reviewed by Angela Duffett Gerald M. Craig, Upper Canada: The Formative Years, 1784–1841, reviewed by John C. Walsh Todd Webb, Transatlantic Methodists: British Wesleyanism and the Formation of an Evangelical Culture in Nineteenth-Century Ontario and Quebec, reviewed by David B. Marshall Renée N. Lafferty, The Guardianship of Best Interests: Institutional Care for the Children of the Poor in Halifax, 1850–1960, reviewed by Michael Boudreau Nicholas Kenny, The Feel of the City: Experiences of Urban Transformation, reviewed by Kathleen Lord Christopher Armstrong, Making Toronto Modern: Architecture and Design, 1895–1975, reviewed by Keith Walden Hugh J.M. Johnston, The Voyage of the Komagata Maru: The Sikh Challenge to Canada's Colour Bar, reviewed by Isabel Wallace Alan B. Anderson, Settling Saskatchewan, reviewed by Barry Ferguson Erik Strikwerda, The Wages of Relief: Cities and the Unemployed in Prairie Canada, 1929–39, reviewed by Lara Campbell Erika Dyck, Facing Eugenics: Reproduction, Sterilization, and the Politics of Choice, reviewed by Molly Ladd-Taylor Marcel Martel, Canada the Good: A Short History of Vice since 1500, reviewed by Mariana Valverde Christopher J. Greig, Ontario Boys: Masculinity and the Idea of Boyhood in Postwar Ontario, 1945–1960, reviewed by Craig Heron Mary Jane Logan McCallum, Indigenous Women, Work, and History, 1940–1980, reviewed by Katrina Srigley Stacey Zembrzycki, According to Baba: A Collaborative Oral History of Sudbury's Ukrainian Community, reviewed by Karen Dubinsky Leon Fink, Joseph A. McCartin, and Joan Sangster, eds., Workers in Hard Times: A Long View of Economic Crises, reviewed by Jason Russell
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.005 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.003 | 0.004 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.007 | 0.004 |
| Open science | 0.003 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.003 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.286 | 0.248 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".