POSICIONAMENTO DE TAMPÕES EM POÇOS DE PETRÓLEO: UMA INVESTIGAÇÃO DE ESCOAMENTOS DE INVERSÃO POR GRAVIDADE
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Cement plug placement in oil industry operations represents an example of buoyancy-driven exchange flows. This situation is highly unstable since cement is usually denser than well fluid and, as a consequence, their positions tend to invert. The present study aims to improve the perception of the physical mechanisms associated to cement plug operations through the analysis of exchange flows. To this end, visualization experiments are performed with denser liquid positioned above a lower-density liquid in a vertical tube. In addition, the interface front speed is determined through image processing and analysis. The influence of the governing parameters is investigated on the speed of inversion and flow regime. The first stage of the study consists of conducting experiments with pairs of immiscible Newtonian liquids with small density difference. Two different flow regimes were examined, namely, falling drops and falling slugs. Experimental results demonstrate that the terminal velocity can be estimated by empirical correlations for falling rigid spheres within a tube. The second stage of the research consists of an exchange flow analysis considering an elastoviscoplastic thixotropic fluid above a less dense Newtonian oil. Three different flow regimes were observed, namely unstable, quasi-stable, and stable (no flow). The unstable regime is a wavy core-annular flow with the denser liquid in the core. In the quasi-stable regime a slow plug flow starts after a time delay, which is a function of material thixotropic and elastic effects. Through analysis of the experimental results it is possible to identify, for a given pair of fluids, the operational window in the governing parameter space within which the speed of inversion is sufficiently low (or zero) to ensure the cement plug operation success.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".