Electro-Disruption of Escherichia coli Bacterial Cells on a Microfabricated Chip
Bibliographic record
Abstract
A miniaturized system for sample preparation of relevant bacterial pathogens has been developed using a variety of microfabrication techniques. The system manipulates and disrupts Eschericha coli bacterial cells using dielectrophoresis, electroporation and enzymes. The microchip consisted of circular gold electrodes patterned on glass using standard photolithography housed in a PDMS chamber. The bacterial lysis efficiency by electroporation and enzymatic degradation was evaluated on the microchip. The miniaturized system was capable of concentrating and aligning bacterial cells in regions of high electric field by dielectrophoresis. The miniaturized sample preparation system had a lysis efficiency of 17% when the bacterial cells were suspended in a 0.25 M sucrose solution and increased to 80% when the bacterial cells were suspended in a solution containing 0.25 M sucrose and 10 KU/ml lysozyme. Sample preparation is a limiting factor for the successful application of molecular pathogen detection methods. Therefore, the development of miniaturized systems useful for sample preparation will improve molecular detection methods of bacterial pathogens
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".