MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4247477931 · doi:10.1109/iembs.2006.4398351

Electro-Disruption of Escherichia coli Bacterial Cells on a Microfabricated Chip

2006· article· en· W4247477931 on OpenAlexaff
Carlos De la Rosa, K.V.I.S. Kaler

Bibliographic record

VenueConference proceedings · 2006
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicBiosensors and Analytical Detection
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Calgary
Fundersnot available
KeywordsDielectrophoresisElectroporationLysisMicrofabricationMaterials scienceBacterial growthSample preparationLab-on-a-chipPhotolithographyEscherichia coliChromatographyNanotechnologyChemistryBacteriaMicrofluidicsBiologyBiochemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A miniaturized system for sample preparation of relevant bacterial pathogens has been developed using a variety of microfabrication techniques. The system manipulates and disrupts Eschericha coli bacterial cells using dielectrophoresis, electroporation and enzymes. The microchip consisted of circular gold electrodes patterned on glass using standard photolithography housed in a PDMS chamber. The bacterial lysis efficiency by electroporation and enzymatic degradation was evaluated on the microchip. The miniaturized system was capable of concentrating and aligning bacterial cells in regions of high electric field by dielectrophoresis. The miniaturized sample preparation system had a lysis efficiency of 17% when the bacterial cells were suspended in a 0.25 M sucrose solution and increased to 80% when the bacterial cells were suspended in a solution containing 0.25 M sucrose and 10 KU/ml lysozyme. Sample preparation is a limiting factor for the successful application of molecular pathogen detection methods. Therefore, the development of miniaturized systems useful for sample preparation will improve molecular detection methods of bacterial pathogens

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.021
Threshold uncertainty score0.516

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.194
Teacher spread0.185 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2006
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueConference proceedingsSame topicBiosensors and Analytical DetectionFrench-language works237,207