L’écriture de la transgression dans le cas d’un processus révolutionnaire
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Cette étude s’inscrit dans le cadre de la compréhension du processus révolutionnaire égyptien durant lequel les manifestants exploitent la force du discours révolutionnaire représenté par les énoncés révolutionnaires scandés ou écrits. Ce discours est caractérisé par la transgression langagière traduite par l’humour et par l’alternance codique entre l’arabe standard et l’arabe dialectal. Ainsi, pendant ces différents soulèvements populaires qu’a connus l’Égypte entre 2011 et 2013, le fait humoristique, qui s’appuie essentiellement sur l’ironie, participe à la mise en évidence des principales revendications des Égyptiens. D’autre part, l’alternance codique traduit le renversement des rôles entre la masse, désormais en position haute, et le régime en place, en position basse.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".