MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4247481421 · doi:10.1111/hdi.2000.4.1.75

Thrombolytic Agents

2000· article· en· W4247481421 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
David Green

Bibliographic record

VenueHemodialysis International · 2000
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldHealth Professions
TopicCentral Venous Catheters and Hemodialysis
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsStreptokinaseUrokinaseMedicineThrombusFibrinFibrinolysisHemodialysis CatheterThrombolysisTissue plasminogen activatorCatheterFibrinolytic agentDialysisSurgeryMyocardial infarctionCardiologyInternal medicineImmunology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Thrombus dissolution is dependent on activators of plasminogen, the principal enzyme of fibrinolysis, reaching plasminogen bound to the surface of fibrin, and overcoming the many inhibitors of clot lysis present in the plasma milieu. In dialysis patients with occluded catheters and grafts, three activators - streptokinase, urokinase, and tissue plasminogen activator (tPA) - have been used. Streptokinase has fallen out of favor because of its adverse effect profile; urokinase has been the mainstay of therapy. Urokinase has been used alone and in conjunction with mechanical methods for clearance of thrombi from arteriovenous grafts. It has also been instilled into occluded central venous catheters, but often is more effective if given systemically during dialysis in order to lyse the fibrin sheath that surrounds the catheter tip. Due of manufacturing problems, urokinase is no longer available and management with tPA is being actively investigated. One small trial showed that recombinant tPA was significantly more effective than urokinase for restoring catheter patency, but the drug is not yet approved for this purpose by the FDA, and current packaging is not optimal. The problems with thrombolytic agents may be obviated in the future by better methods of prevention of thrombus formation, monitoring flow to anticipate occlusion, and early mechanical interventions to restore patency.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.049
Threshold uncertainty score0.164

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0020.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0020.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0490.035

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.048
GPT teacher head0.371
Teacher spread0.324 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2000
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueHemodialysis International→Same topicCentral Venous Catheters and Hemodialysis→French-language works237,207→