MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4247511419 · doi:10.24124/2018/58841

The Alaska Highway Gas Pipeline easement: A Kluane First Nation case study

2018· dissertation· en· W4247511419 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Kai Peetoom

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typedissertation
Languageen
FieldHealth Professions
TopicIndigenous Studies and Ecology
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsEasementIndigenousGovernment (linguistics)First nationEnvironmental planningGeographyPolitical scienceEnvironmental resource managementEnvironmental protectionLawEcologyEnvironmental science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The Alaska Highway Gas Pipeline (AHGP) is a major industrial development project proposed within the Yukon since 1977, which remains unconstructed. The AHGP Easement represents the most significant aspect of the AHGP in the Yukon and remains a long-standing land tenure right impeding southern Yukon First Nations. This applied research project partnered with Kluane First Nation (KFN) to identify and address potential consequences associated with the AHGP Easement that are currently relevant to KFN as a self-governing Yukon First Nation. Community-based, decolonizing qualitative research methodologies were employed to gather understandings of the AHGP Easement from key KFN citizens, as well as Yukon and federal government officials and industry representatives. Findings emerging from the research highlight issues of jurisdictional complexity among Indigenous peoples and the Crown, the need to consider contextual change, and problems with the existing regulatory, assessment and consultation framework for the AHGP.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: Qualitative
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.836
Threshold uncertainty score0.326

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0170.003
Scholarly communication0.0020.002
Open science0.0010.004
Research integrity0.0020.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.059
GPT teacher head0.395
Teacher spread0.337 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designQualitative
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2018
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicIndigenous Studies and Ecology→French-language works237,207→