MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W424753795 · doi:10.26522/vp.v3i1.520

Le recueil de nouvelles de Danièle Vallée Debout sur la tête d’un chat reflète-t-il une identité franco-ontarienne ?

2006· article· fr· W424753795 on OpenAlexaffvenue
Hélène Caron

Bibliographic record

VenueVoix Plurielles · 2006
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicCanadian Identity and History
Canadian institutionsMcMaster University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesArt

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Du recueil de nouvelles Debout sur la tête d’un chat, écrit par l’auteure franco-ontarienne Danièle Vallée, émerge un fil conducteur indicateur d’une perte d’équilibre et d’une lutte pour la survie qui remet en question la notion d’espace identitaire de chaque personnage. Le recueil de nouvelles de Danièle Vallée reflète-t-il une identité franco-ontarienne ? Certaines facettes de l’identité franco-ontarienne seront cernées et mettront en lumière les éléments de réponse analysés par la suite. La synthèse des éléments présentés démontrera qu’une réponse absolue n’existe pas à la question de départ, mais plutôt que l’ensemble

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.013
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: Qualitative
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.266
Threshold uncertainty score0.536

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.013
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0030.003
Science and technology studies0.0200.008
Scholarly communication0.0060.005
Open science0.0010.003
Research integrity0.0020.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0170.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.006
GPT teacher head0.201
Teacher spread0.195 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designQualitative
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2006
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueVoix PluriellesSame topicCanadian Identity and HistoryFrench-language works237,207