MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4247564337 · doi:10.5755/j01.erem.56.2.272

Profundal-Pelagic Macrocrustacean Abundance in Boreal Lakes Before and After Experimental Clearcut Logging

2011· article· en· W4247564337 on OpenAlex
Robert France

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.

Bibliographic record

VenueEnvironmental Research Engineering and Management · 2011
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicAquatic Invertebrate Ecology and Behavior
Canadian institutionsDalhousie University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsClearcuttingTaigaBorealPelagic zoneEcologyLoggingAbundance (ecology)Environmental scienceOceanographyBiologyGeology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A sampling program of 9 years revealed that the opossum shrimp Mysis relicta and the amphipod Diporeia hoyi were present in three boreal lakes in northwestern Ontario, Canada regardless of whether watershed forests were left completely intact, left as only a narrow buffer strip, or were nearly completely removed through experimental clearcutting. In fact, Diporeia were actually found to be more abundant in all lakes following logging. And the decline in Mysis abundance observed in one of the lakes occurred well before the initiation of timber removal. Consequently, it appears that these keystone, glacial-relic species of macrocrustaceans are not negatively impacted by clearcutting. This is in direct contrast to the hyper-sensitivity and extirpation of these same species which has been previously demonstrated in acidifying boreal lakes.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.043
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.018
GPT teacher head0.250
Teacher spread0.232 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it