Geological Association of Canada Newfoundland Section Abstracts: 2014 Spring Technical Meeting
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The 2014 Spring Technical Meeting was once again held in the depths of the Newfoundland winter in the Johnson GEO CENTRE on scenic Signal Hill in St. John's.The meeting featured a special session on Monday afternoon entitled "Offshore Petroleum Basins: A New Frontier" which covered a wide range of subjects related to offshore petroleum basins, including geology and geophysics, plate reconstruction, offshore engineering and environmental considerations In addition, general sessions (Monday morning and all day Tuesday) included papers on an eclectic range of topics, as is normally the case at these meetings.Due to unforeseen circumstances the "Public Lecture" series, sponsored by the Professional Engineers and Geoscientists of Newfoundland and Labrador (PEG-NL) was postponed to a later date.The speaker would have been Dr. Andrew Kerr from the Department of Natural Resources, Geological Survey with a talk entitled "Holmes and the Indelicate Question: Measuring the Depth of Time with the Clocks of the Earth."As always, this meeting is brought to you by volunteer efforts, and would not be possible without the time and energy of the executive and other members of the Newfoundland and Labrador Section of the Geological Association of Canada.We are also indebted to our partners in this venture, particularly the Alexander Murray Geology Club, the Johnson GEO CENTRE, the Newfoundland and Labrador Department of Natural Resources and our corporate sponsors.We are equally pleased to see the abstracts published in Atlantic Geology.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.004 | 0.007 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.004 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.203 | 0.076 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".