Bibliographic record
Abstract
Reservoir Souring in the Caroline Field C.J. Seto; C.J. Seto Shell Canada Ltd. Search for other works by this author on: This Site Google Scholar D.A. Beliveau D.A. Beliveau Shell Canada Ltd. Search for other works by this author on: This Site Google Scholar Paper presented at the SPE/CERI Gas Technology Symposium, Calgary, Alberta, Canada, April 2000. Paper Number: SPE-59778-MS https://doi.org/10.2118/59778-MS Published: April 03 2000 Cite View This Citation Add to Citation Manager Share Icon Share Twitter LinkedIn Get Permissions Search Site Citation Seto, C.J., and D.A. Beliveau. "Reservoir Souring in the Caroline Field." Paper presented at the SPE/CERI Gas Technology Symposium, Calgary, Alberta, Canada, April 2000. doi: https://doi.org/10.2118/59778-MS Download citation file: Ris (Zotero) Reference Manager EasyBib Bookends Mendeley Papers EndNote RefWorks BibTex Search Dropdown Menu toolbar search search input Search input auto suggest filter your search All ContentAll ProceedingsSociety of Petroleum Engineers (SPE)SPE Unconventional Resources Conference / Gas Technology Symposium Search Advanced Search AbstractThis paper presents a novel mechanism for reservoir souring which is based on the evolution of acid gas from sour aqueous phases present in the reservoir. Souring is a widespread phenomenon in seawater floods. The accepted mechanism in these cases is biogenic activity of sulfate reducing bacteria (SRB).Field data from the Caroline reservoir indicate that it is souring. What is intriguing about this field is that it is being developed via conventional blowdown depletion, which suggests that SRB is not the cause. The mechanism presented is based on the physical principles of Henry's Law, which govern the solubility of hydrogen sulfide (H2S) in water.Through material balance analysis and reservoir simulation, the Caroline field is presented as a case study where this mechanism is plausible. Reservoir simulation which account for this phenomenon was subsequently used to generate more realistic gas composition, thus optimizing the operations of the $1 billion Caroline facility.IntroductionReservoir souring is a term which generally applies to any process which increases the H2S concentration in a reservoir. In this paper, reservoir souring refers to the increase of H2S concentration in the produced fluid.H2S is reactive and highly toxic; increasing amounts of it pose serious health, safety and environmental concerns. Detrimental souring effects include increased corrosion rates of iron and steel, precipitation of ferrous sulfide and contamination of produced fluids. Due to these concerns, reservoir souring can result in significant costs associated with replacement of downhole and surface equipment and increased refining costs due to higher sulfur content of produced hydrocarbons, potentially resulting in early abandonment of the reservoir.From the start of its seven-year production history, the Caroline field has experienced increases in H2S concentration (1–4 mole %). The souring experienced in Caroline differs from that experienced in other fields in that this is a gas condensate reservoir being developed via conventional blowdown. Moreover, the produced fluids are already quite sour (33–39 mole % H2S at discovery).The proposed mechanism for reservoir souring is based on the fact that H2S is more soluble in water than hydrocarbons are (at 36.5 MPa and 106°C: solubility of H2S = 32.8 g/L, solubility of CH4 = 1.2 g/L). As the reservoir pressure is depleted through production, acid gas is liberated from the aqueous phases, be they regional aquifers or connate water, in order to re-establish equilibrium between gaseous and aqueous phases of the reservoir.The purpose of this paper is to demonstrate that acid gas liberation from aqueous phases within the reservoir is a potential mechanism for reservoir souring. Shell Canada's Caroline field is provided as a case study where this mechanism could occur.Caroline Reservoir.The Caroline field is located approximately 150 km north of Calgary, in the province of Alberta. Discovered in 1986, and on full scale production since 1993, Caroline is the largest discovery of its kind in the Western Canadian Sedimentary Basin in the past 30 years.1 It is a sour, retrograde condensate reservoir containing 56 BCM of gas initially in place (GIIP). Average reservoir properties are presented in Table 1.The Caroline reservoir is a highly dolomitized, reefal carbonate complex producing from the Swan Hills member of the Devonian Beaverhill Lake formation, located at a depth of approximately 3500 m. The reservoir has a northwest strike and southwest dip of approximately 25 m/km. Gas is stratigraphically trapped updip by the shales and argillaceous limestones of the Waterways Formation (forming the top seal) and the limestone, siltstones and shales of the Calumet and Elk Point Formations (comprising the bottom seal).Caroline Reservoir.The Caroline field is located approximately 150 km north of Calgary, in the province of Alberta. Discovered in 1986, and on full scale production since 1993, Caroline is the largest discovery of its kind in the Western Canadian Sedimentary Basin in the past 30 years.1 It is a sour, retrograde condensate reservoir containing 56 BCM of gas initially in place (GIIP). Average reservoir properties are presented in Table 1.The Caroline reservoir is a highly dolomitized, reefal carbonate complex producing from the Swan Hills member of the Devonian Beaverhill Lake formation, located at a depth of approximately 3500 m. The reservoir has a northwest strike and southwest dip of approximately 25 m/km. Gas is stratigraphically trapped updip by the shales and argillaceous limestones of the Waterways Formation (forming the top seal) and the limestone, siltstones and shales of the Calumet and Elk Point Formations (comprising the bottom seal). Keywords: concentration, aquifer, mechanism, production chemistry, reservoir souring, upstream oil & gas, corrosion inhibition, reservoir simulation, hydrocarbon, oilfield chemistry Subjects: Production Chemistry, Metallurgy and Biology, Reservoir Characterization, Reservoir Simulation, Corrosion inhibition and management (including H2S and CO2) This content is only available via PDF. 2000. Society of Petroleum Engineers You can access this article if you purchase or spend a download.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.004 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.003 | 0.003 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.022 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".