MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4247581412 · doi:10.4141/p06-047

Tristar fenugreek

2007· article· en· W4247581412 on OpenAlexaffvenueabout
S. N. Acharya, S. Blade, Z. Mir, J. R. Moyer

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Journal of Plant Science · 2007
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldNursing
TopicMicrobial Metabolites in Food Biotechnology
Canadian institutionsUniversity of AlbertaAgriculture and Agri-Food Canada
Fundersnot available
KeywordsTrigonellaCultivarLegumeForageDiosgeninAgronomyYield (engineering)BiologyBiomass (ecology)FodderAgricultureHorticulture

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Tristar is an annual forage legume cultivar of fenugreek (Trigonella foenum-graceum). This cultivar was developed at the Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada (AAFC) Research Centre, Lethbridge, AB. Tristar biomass yield was 2 and 11% higher than the check cultivar Amber under dryland and irrigated conditions, respectively. This cultivar produced 26% more seed yield than Amber under irrigated condition in southern Alberta. Tristar will be an attractive alternative to alfalfa in short-term rotations as it produces as much biomass as two cuts of alfalfa and unlike alfalfa is bloat free and contains the steroidal compound diosgenin. Key words: Fenugreek, Trigonella foenum-graecum, annual legume, forage yield, forage quality

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.559
Threshold uncertainty score0.997

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.243
Teacher spread0.229 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations14
Published2007
Admission routes3
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian Journal of Plant ScienceSame topicMicrobial Metabolites in Food BiotechnologyFrench-language works237,207