MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4247587242 · doi:10.1353/rah.2006.0065

Racialized Bodies

2006· article· en· W4247587242 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Stephanie Lewthwaite

Bibliographic record

VenueReviews in American History · 2006
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicLatin American and Latino Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsChinatownImmigrationQuarter (Canadian coin)Settlement (finance)CherokeeHistorySociologyGenealogyPolitical scienceLawArchaeology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Racialized Bodies Stephanie Lewthwaite (bio) Natalia Molina. Fit to Be Citizens? Public Health and Race in Los Angeles, 1879–1939. Berkeley: University of California Press, 2006. 293 pp. Photographs, maps, tables, notes, bibliography, and index. $50.00 (cloth); $19.95 (paper). Now the adobe . . . has become a tenement for several families, and the courtyard has been honey-combed with shacks, and tents, and non-descript barn-tenements of one and two rooms . . . until one can think of nothing but the squalor of a Chinese city. Bessie Stoddart, "The Courts of Sonoratown," 1905 1 In her exposé of "the housing problem" in Los Angeles, Bessie Stoddart surveyed the rapidly changing contours of Sonoratown, the old Mexican Quarter of the city. By 1905, Mexican immigrants had arrived in greater numbers to work on the railroads and in agriculture. As a settlement house worker and a member of several pioneering municipal commissions in Progressive-era Los Angeles, Stoddart played an instrumental role in appointing the first district nurse and in establishing the city's first housing commission of 1906. Her career illuminates the development of public health and housing policy in Los Angeles at the turn of the century. But more than this, Stoddart's analysis of the impact of Mexican immigration upon the city was predicated on an important analogy: she framed her discussion within an existing racialized discourse, a discourse that made specific reference to Asia. In geographical terms, the old Mexican Quarter of Sonoratown bordered Chinatown in early-twentieth-century Los Angeles. Mexican and Chinese inhabitants were also entwined in the social imagination of the city's reformers and health officials. The parallels made by early-twentieth-century reformers such as Stoddart draw our attention to the ways in which immigrants—and their descendants—have historically been racialized in relation to both white and non-white groups. When examining processes of racialization, historians often underplay these complexities. Yet these nuances are brought out forcefully in Natalia Molina's Fit to Be Citizens? Molina examines the perception and treatment of Chinese, Japanese, and Mexican communities in late-nineteenth- and early-twentieth-century Los Angeles through the prism of public health. By analyzing how [End Page 482] public health discourse and policy racialized, excluded, and/or sought to reform different groups at different times in relation to one another, Molina moves us beyond the conventional mono-ethnic study. Whilst discourses on the Chinese and the Japanese framed the perception, reception, and racialization of Mexicans and Mexican Americans in Los Angeles, health authorities treated these ethnic groups very differently, and their position within the racial hierarchy shifted over time. Molina demonstrates the fluid and socially constructed nature of race. Her emphasis on institutional practice, discourse, and the racialization of space also signifies that cultural geography remains a critical methodological tool with which to understand the mapping and remapping of race in the United States. Molina's work certainly falls within a recent body of critical literature that examines the intersection of race and geography, a focus evident in studies of LA as the "Latino Metropolis," and in work documenting the importance of spatial identities in Chicano/a literary and cultural production.2 Molina's historical dimension complements earlier studies of "barrioization," and the more recent "spatial turn" in Chicano/a, immigration, ethnic, and labor history.3 By examining how race is "regionally constructed," Molina's interdisciplinary study also enriches the recent scholarship that moves us beyond the black-white paradigm (p. 48). Ultimately, the focus of Fit to Be Citizens? falls upon Mexicans and Mexican Americans, and as Molina's comparative analysis unravels, we emerge with a greater understanding of why Latinos/as are located "at the intersection of several racializing dynamics" in contemporary America.4 Asian and Mexican immigration dramatically reshaped the economy and demographic landscape of California and the Southwest, and helped build Los Angeles as a city and metropolitan region. By examining the various waves of immigration and the significance of federal legislation such as the 1882 Chinese Exclusion Act and the 1924 Johnson-Reed Act, Fit to Be Citizens? is grounded within the existing historiography of immigration. Molina's analysis is partly structured through its attention to the nativism...

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.787
Threshold uncertainty score0.982

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.037
GPT teacher head0.327
Teacher spread0.291 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2006
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueReviews in American HistorySame topicLatin American and Latino StudiesFrench-language works237,207