MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4247602945 · doi:10.1142/9789812701848_0062

FIRST RESULTS FROM THE CERN AXION SOLAR TELESCOPE (CAST)

2005· article· en· W4247602945 on OpenAlexaff
S. Andriamonje, V. Arsov, S. Aune, D. Autiero, F. T. Avignone, K. Barth, А. С. Белов, B. Beltrán, H. Bräuninger, J. M. Carmona, S. Cebrián, E. Chesi, J. I. Collar, R. Creswick, T. Dafní, M. Davenport, L. Di Lella, C. Eleftheriadis, J. Englhauser, G. Fanourakis, H.A. Farach, E. Ferrer, H. Fischer, J. Franz, P. Friedrich, T. Geralis, I. Giomataris, S. Gninenko, N. Goloubev, M. D. Hasinoff, F. H. Heinsius, David Hoffmann, I.G. Irastorza, J. Jacoby, Daekyoung Kang, K. Königsmann, R. Kotthaus, M. Krčmar, K. Kousouris, M. Kuster, B. Lakić, C. Lasseur, Alexandros Liolios, A. Ljubičić, G. Lutz, G. Luzón, D. W. Miller, Alberto Immanuel Conti Morales, José Manuel Morales, M. Mutterer, A. Nikolaidis, Aroa Ejarque Ortiz, T. Papaevangelou, A. Placci, Georg G. Raffelt, J. Ruz, H. Riege, M.L. Sarsa, I. Savvidis, W. Serber, Pasquale Dario Serpico, Yannis K. Semertzidis, L. Stewart, J. D. Vieira, J.A. Villar, L. Walckiers, K. Zachariadou, K. Zioutas

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicParticle Accelerators and Free-Electron Lasers
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia
Fundersnot available
KeywordsLarge Hadron ColliderAxionTelescopePhysicsAstronomyParticle physicsDark matter

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Hypothetical axion-like particles with a two-photon interaction would be produced in the Sun by the Primakoff process. In a laboratory magnetic field (``axion helioscope'') they would be transformed into X-rays with energies of a few keV. Using a decommissioned LHC test magnet, CAST has been running for about 6 months during 2003. The first results from the analysis of these data are presented here. No signal above background was observed, implying an upper limit to the axion-photon coupling < 1.16 10^{-10} GeV^-1 at 95% CL for m_a <~0.02 eV. This limit is comparable to the limit from stellar energy-loss arguments and considerably more restrictive than any previous experiment in this axion mass range.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.005
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.005
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.008
Threshold uncertainty score0.028

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0050.005
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.002
Science and technology studies0.0020.001
Scholarly communication0.0030.001
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0080.004

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.194
Teacher spread0.182 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations14
Published2005
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicParticle Accelerators and Free-Electron LasersFrench-language works237,207