MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4247631688 · doi:10.1109/aspdac.2005.1466116

Leakage power: trends, analysis and avoidance

2005· article· en· W4247631688 on OpenAlexaff
D. Blaauw, Anirudh Devgan, Farid N. Najm

Bibliographic record

VenueProceedings of the ASP-DAC 2005. Asia and South Pacific Design Automation Conference, 2005. · 2005
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicLow-power high-performance VLSI design
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsLeakage (economics)Subthreshold conductionLeakage powerElectronic engineeringTransistorElectrical engineeringScalingComputer scienceCircuit designVoltageEngineeringMathematics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Leakage power is emerging as a key challenge in IC design. Leakage is increasingly exponentially with each technology generation and is expected to become the dominant part of total power. Device threshold voltage scaling, shrinking device dimensions, and larger circuit sizes are causing this dramatic increase in leakage. As leakage varies exponentially with process parameters, yield of the chip is often directly influenced by leakage. Increasing amount of leakage is also critical for power constraint ICs. Traditionally, leakage has been considered as an important design variable in handheld devices and in standby circuit operation. However, this significant increase of leakage now warrants that it be considered as the key design variable in all IC designs. This tutorial presents a comprehensive review of leakage power issues in IC design. The tutorial is organized in four major parts. The first part provides an overview of technology and scaling trends which are causing the significant increase in leakage current. The device physics that leads to subthreshold and gate leakage were described, along with their dependence on circuit design variables. This part of the tutorial also covered basic transistor and circuit techniques to minimize leakage, such as the stack effect. The second part of the tutorial focused on circuit level leakage estimation and avoidance. Use of multiple threshold voltages has been very successful in controlling the leakage of the circuit. Comprehensive description of multiple-Vt techniques for leakage avoidance will be presented along with associated leakage estimation techniques. Multiple-threshold design (MTCMOS) will be described along with its leakage benefits and performance trade-offs. Multiple oxide technology options and associated impact on gate leakage will also be discussed. Third part of the tutorial focuses on chip level effects on leakage. Leakage is heavily dependent on local and global process variations and can vary by an order of magnitude over the technology spread. Leakage estimation techniques which consider both inter and intra die process variations were covered. This part of the tutorial also focuses on chip-level leakage minimization techniques. Leakage minimization techniques such as adaptive body bias (ABB) and power supply control were presented. The last part of the tutorial covers system and circuit architectures for leakage avoidance. In standby mode, the leakage of the circuit can be lowered by putting it a low-leakage state. Caches and memory circuits occupy large percentage of area in model chips. The leakage of caches and memories need to be carefully controlled. This section of the tutorial covered topics including state assignment for leakage minimization, leakage-driven memory and cache circuits and architectures. The tutorial is intended for designers and CAD engineers interested in next generation design techniques and methodologies and emerging power challenges. Basic background of VLSI and CAD is useful though not needed.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.776
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.194
Teacher spread0.185 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2005
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueProceedings of the ASP-DAC 2005. Asia and South Pacific Design Automation Conference, 2005.Same topicLow-power high-performance VLSI designFrench-language works237,207