MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Letter to The Editor

2006· letter· en· W4247646234 on OpenAlexaff
Michael J. Strong, Sashi Kesavapany, Harish C. Pant

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Neuropathology & Experimental Neurology · 2006
Typeletter
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicDementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
Canadian institutionsWestern University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPsychoanalysisPsychology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Response: We thank Drs. Cairns, Bigio, and MacKenzie for their careful comments regarding the neuropathologic features of motor neuron disease with cognitive impairment. The main focus of our review was on the nature of protein aggregation in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) and in this context, our discussion of the frontotemporal degeneration in ALS was necessarily truncated. It did not discuss the nature of the pathology of the broader spectrum of the frontotemporal lobar degenerations (FTLD) in which the pathology of ALS can also be occasionally observed. In this sense, we agree with many of their comments. However, it is important to recognize there exists a fundamental disconnection between the clinical realm of study of frontotemporal dysfunction in ALS and that of the neuropathologist studying FTLD. This is not an issue of omission, but rather reflects the fledgling nature of our understanding of the nonmotor system involvement that may occur in ALS. Clinicians recognize that the spectrum of cognitive dysfunction or dementia that may occur in ALS is heterogeneous, ranging from subtle syndromes of cognitive, behavioral, or executive dysfunction to a florid dementia meeting the Neary criteria for FTD (1) and, in a small proportion, a frontally predominant concomitant Alzheimer disease (2). There are few prospective studies that crisply correlate these clinical phenotypes to their respective neuropathologic substrates, although (with the exception of the latter) the common thread appears to be a FTLD. The problem arises when the neuropathologic substrate of FTLD is found to coexist with features of motor neuron degeneration, the scenario(s) to which the authors allude. We would agree with the authors that a key aspect of the neuropathology of ALS with FTLD is the presence of ubiquitin positive, tau, and α-synuclein-negative intraneuronal inclusions. However, although the overexpression of ubiquitin may be a key aspect of the neuropathology of FTLD with ALS, one cannot rule out the presence of tau and α-synuclein using the methodologies described in references 2 through 5. It would also be erroneous to give the impression that such inclusions are unique to ALS or pathognomonic of ALS coexistent with FTLD. Examples of the caution that needs to be given to interpreting this pathology include the recent description of an akinetic rigid syndrome with supranuclear gaze palsy phenotypically that of progressive supranuclear palsy (PSP) in which the neuropathology was typical of that of ALS with FTLD, including the ubiquitin inclusions (3). Conversely, the failure to find this “typical” pathology has been well described (4). We and others have also suggested that, for a population of patients with ALS with cognitive impairment, it is the “load” of ubiquitin-positive aggregates that also appears to be relevant, as opposed to the absolute presence or absence5. We disagree that the observation of tau aggregation is an incidental finding in that it is now abundantly obvious that alterations in tau metabolism can occur in ALS, including in hyperendemic foci of ALS in Guam and the Kii Peninsula of Japan, familial variants of FTD with ALS (with or without linkage to chromosome 9 or 17) (6), and in at least some cases of sporadic ALS with cognitive impairment(7-9). A careful study of the frontal cortex, in the region most affected in ALS, reveals that such pathologic changes are not observed as a function of normal aging nor that they are nonspecific (10). It is too early in our understanding of the spectrum of ALS with dementia or cognitive impairment to be dogmatic with regard to clinicopathologic classifications. Indeed, until such time as careful molecular and neuropathologic studies are married to equally diligent clinical antemortem studies, this field remains undefined. The likelihood is, however, that the frontotemporal syndromes of ALS will encompass a heterogeneous clinicopathologic syndrome with various neuropathologies superimposed on the more traditional pathology of ALS. Among this grouping will undoubtedly be those disorders in which ALS coexists with alterations in tau metabolism. As highlighted by the authors, the challenge will be to define not only these, but the substrate of the ubiquitin conjugation that also appears to be a marker of a subpopulation of these patients. In this sense, the point of our article remains valid. At the heart of ALS lies a proteinopathy.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.014
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Editorial · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.989
Threshold uncertainty score0.037

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.014
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0020.001
Scholarly communication0.0020.002
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0210.013
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0110.008

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.015
GPT teacher head0.304
Teacher spread0.289 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEditorial

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2006
Admission routes1
Has abstractno

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Neuropathology & Experimental NeurologySame topicDementia and Cognitive Impairment ResearchFrench-language works237,207