Multitask Deep Learning Reconstruction and Localization of Lesions in Limited Angle Diffuse Optical Tomography
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Diffuse optical tomography (DOT) leverages near-infrared light propagation through tissue to assess its optical properties and identify abnormalities. DOT image reconstruction from limited-angle data acquisition is severely ill-posed due to the highly scattered photons in the medium and the relatively small number of collected projections. Reconstructions are thus commonly marred by artifacts and, as a result, it is difficult to obtain accurate reconstruction of target objects, e.g., malignant lesions. Reconstruction does not always ensure good localization of small lesions. Furthermore, conventional optimization-based reconstruction methods are computationally expensive, rendering them too slow for real-time imaging applications. Our goal is to develop a fast and accurate image reconstruction method using deep learning, where multitask learning ensures accurate lesion localization in addition to improved reconstruction. We apply spatial-wise attention and a distance transform based loss function in a novel multitask learning formulation to improve localization and reconstruction compared to single-task optimized methods. Given the scarcity of real-world sensor-image pairs required for training supervised deep learning models, we leverage physics-based simulation to generate synthetic datasets and use a transfer learning module to align the sensor domain distribution between in silico and real-world data, while taking advantage of cross-domain learning. Both quantitative and qualitative results on phantom and real data indicate the superiority of our multitask method in the reconstruction and localization of lesions in tissue compared to state-of-the-art methods. The results demonstrate that multitask learning provides sharper and more accurate reconstruction.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".