Bibliographic record
Abstract
General Chair Prof. Tek-Tjing Lie, Auckland University of Technology, New Zealand Conference Committee Co-Chairs Prof. Emanuele Calabrò, Institute of Industrial Technology, Italy Prof. Guojie Li, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, China Advisory Committee Chair Prof. Man Chung WONG, University of Macau, Macau Program Chair Prof. Moustafa Eissa, Helwan university, Egypt Local Committee Prof. Zhengzhi Lin, Zhejiang University, China Dr. Chengjin Ye, Zhejiang University, China International Technical Committee Dr. Khoa Dang Hoang, University of Sheffield, UK Prof. Zulfiqar Khan, Bournemouth University, UK Dr. Shuheng Chen, University of Electronic Science and Technology of China, China Dr. Tosak Thasananuyariya, Metropolitan Electricity Authority, Thailand Dr. Prakornchai Polratanasak, North Eastern University, Khonkaen, Thailand Dr. Michael Bernard, University of Alberta, Canada Dr. Mohamed Yahia Edries, Space Division National Authority for Remote Sensing and Space Science, Egypt Dr. Thongchart Kerdphol, Kyushu Institute of Technology, Japan Dr. Hany Farag, York University, Canada Dr. Narottam Das, University of Southern Queensland, Australia Prof. Dimitris Labridis, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, Greece Dr. Nickey Brown, Wright State University, USA Dr. Jiafeng Xie, Wright State University, USA Dr. Mohamed Dahidah, Newcastle University, UK Prof. Lei Chen, Wuhan University, China Dr. Mehrdad Ahmadi Kamarposhti, Jouybar Branch Islamic Azad University, Iran
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".