MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4247660301 · doi:10.33423/jmpp.v20i5.2597

A Pioneering Platform: Strengthening Environmental Democracy and Justice in Latin America and the Caribbean

2019· article· en· W4247660301 on OpenAlexaff
Giada Ferrucci

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Management Policy and Practice · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicClimate Change and Geoengineering
Canadian institutionsWestern University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsLatin AmericansDemocracyPolitical scienceEnvironmental justiceEconomic JusticeDevelopment economicsEconomicsLawPolitics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Latin America is considered the most dangerous region in the world for environmental defenders due to increasingly deadly conflicts over natural resources. After a six-year negotiation process, on March 4, 2018, the Regional Agreement on Access to Information, Public Participation and Justice in Environmental Matters was approved by 24 countries, as the region’s first-ever legally binding treaty on environmental rights. The Regional Agreement, also known as Escazú Convention, represents a pioneering platform supporting global environmental justice. This paper examines how the provisions of this Convention can reduce barriers that undermine vulnerable communities’ ability to exercise their environmental rights.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Other design · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.779
Threshold uncertainty score0.267

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.248
Teacher spread0.235 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designOther design
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2019
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Management Policy and PracticeSame topicClimate Change and GeoengineeringFrench-language works237,207