MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4247681329 · doi:10.32843/infrastruct52-7

WORLD TRENDS AND UKRAINIAN REALITIES OF THE STARTUP MARKET

2021· article· en· W4247681329 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Svitlana Perminova

Bibliographic record

VenueMarket Infrastructure · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEconomics, Econometrics and Finance
TopicEconomic Issues in Ukraine
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsUkrainianInvestment (military)BusinessVenture capitalAttractivenessProductivityEntrepreneurshipDomestic marketMarket economyEconomic policyInternational tradeEconomic growthFinanceEconomicsPolitical science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The article analyzes the trends of the global market of startups as an important factor in economic growth. The reasons for the leadership of the North American, European and Asian startup markets are outlined.Emphasis is placed on the most attractive areas of investment and technology, which according to expert estimates in the near future will be actively developed and bring significant profits, as well as have an impact on global processes of transformation of life and activities. Priority domestic industries are outlined: IT, which is constantly growing and in recent years brings significant profits, attracting the attention of the world's largest companies from the United States, Europe and Canada; agro-sphere, which, provided the involvement of startup projects has every chance to compete with developed countries in terms of productivity, complexity of approach and speed of development. The source of development of the domestic market of startups has been identified, which was the expansion and strengthening of the investment attractiveness of Ukrainian developments, which led to an increase in venture and private investment, which reached more than half a billion dollars. An analysis of the national market of startups, which shows recovery, especially in the technology sector due to the conclusion of a significant number of investment agreements, the interest of world leaders opening R&D centers, offices and domestic companies and foundations in Ukraine that actively support Ukrainian startups by investing millions of dollars. Based on the study of world experience in supporting innovative projects, the reasons that hinder the development of both domestic startups and priority industries for the country are outlined. The state initiatives on: launching the Startup Fund, which provides assistance to domestic entrepreneurs-innovators in the form of grants as a result of competitive selection; launch of the 360 Tech Ecosystem Overview platform by the Ministry of Digital Transformation to search for business information about IT companies, startups, investors and the entire technological ecosystem of Ukraine; development of draft laws for the development of the Ukrainian IT sector. Stimulating mechanisms have been identified that successfully work in the orientation of the economy to innovative development.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.010
Threshold uncertainty score0.021

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.003
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0030.001
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.201
Teacher spread0.190 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMarket InfrastructureSame topicEconomic Issues in UkraineFrench-language works237,207