Bibliographic record
Abstract
To provide enough food for a projected world population of 9 billion by 2050, planners and policy makers must focus on supporting healthy ecosystems, according to a report released in late August by the United Nations Environment Programme (UNEP; Nairobi, Kenya) and the International Water Management Institute (IWMI; Colombo, Sri Lanka), in cooperation with 19 additional organizations. The report, Ecosystems for Water and Food Security (www.unep.org/pdf/depi-ecosystems-food-secur.pdf), addresses the need to “produce approximately 70% more food [by 2050] to cope with growing population and dietary changes” and the “paradox of having to grow more food with less water”, as written in the foreword by Colin Chartres, IWMI Director General. Eline Boelee, Senior Researcher of Water and Health at IWMI and Scientific Editor of the report, says “Our publication brings authors from the environmental sector together with agricultural scientists in all disciplines (crop, livestock, aquaculture, and agroforestry) to produce a coherent message. Where other publications have focused on water and environment, food and water, or environment and food, our document focuses on the three-way interdependence [among] ecosystems, water, and food security, demonstrating how ecosystem management can be improved to ensure water availability and avoid future food crises.” Boelee continues, “Agriculture needs to change to provide food security in the long term without degrading its own resource base – to grow food and encourage healthy, natural and agricultural ecosystems. In a farming context, nature essentially supports nurture (for example, with pollination, soil health, water quality, and biodiversity). We need to think about ecosystems plus (not versus) agriculture, or conservation plus (not versus) cultivation.” The report contains specific recommendations to encourage and sustain the health of farmland, drylands, wetlands, fisheries, and livestock systems, including planting diverse crops and species of trees on farmland that will ensure soil health and conserve water; managing the collection of rainfall and runoff; and educating people on appropriate livestock-grazing practices – even children, who in many parts of the world are responsible for this task. Directed toward policy makers and mid-level professionals, the report will “help them take up their responsibility in enhancing food security in a sustainable way”, says Boelee. “The sooner people start managing agro-ecosystems, the higher the chance for success in reducing degradation and enhancing production and productivity.” A field study that quantifies the behavior of the Pacific leaping blenny (Alticus arnoldorum), a largely terrestrial fish, provides new insights into some of the adaptations that may have been necessary for the colonization of land by aquatic creatures in the late Devonian period. “Our study gives us a glimpse into the past”, says Tonia Hsieh (Temple University, Philadelphia, PA), “and can help us understand one of the most critical ecological transitions that vertebrates had to make during evolution”. The Pacific leaping blenny is a small marine fish (3–5 cm in length) that lives along rocky coastlines in Micronesia, including the island of Guam. Although the fish needs to stay moist to enable it to breathe through its skin, it is almost entirely terrestrial and is extremely agile on land, where it uses a combination of tail-twisting and expanded pectoral and tail fins to move. A female Alticus perched on a rock above water. During their investigation, Hsieh and behavioral scientist Terry Ord (University of New South Wales, Kensington, Australia) made detailed observations of the abundance, behavior, and morphology of A arnoldorum on the eastern side of Guam during the breeding season (Ethology 2011; doi:10.1111/j.1439-0310.2011.01949.x). The researchers report that the blennies – despite eating and breeding on land, and defending terrestrial territories as part of a complex social behavior – were heavily constrained by the tidal cycle and temperature. “Even though these fish spend their whole adult life on land, they are still very tightly connected with the aquatic realm”, explains Hsieh, “and are only active during a brief period at mid-tide”. “This well-conducted study quantifies aspects of the terrestrial behavior of A arnoldorum in a way that has not been done before”, comments inter-tidal fish researcher John Green of Memorial University (St John's, Newfoundland and Labrador, Canada), “but probably adds little to our knowledge of the role of ecology in evolution”. Both Green and Hsieh note, however, that comparative studies of members of the family Blenniidae that exhibit different degrees of “terrestriality” and that live around Guam have the potential to reveal fundamental insights into the transition of vertebrates from water to land. As this year's Arctic sea-ice coverage shrank toward record summer lows, a synthesis report from the Arctic Monitoring and Assessment Programme (AMAP; Oslo, Norway) described other regional global warming trends, including a fourfold loss in mass of the Greenland Ice Sheet as compared with conditions between 1995 and 2000. Entitled the Snow, Ice, Water and Permafrost Assessment (http://amap.no/swipa/), the synthesis report – also known as SWIPA – was produced by AMAP for the Arctic Council, an eight-nation intergovernmental group focused on environmental protection and sustainable development. The SWIPA report predicts that – if current trends continue – global sea-level rise could top 1.6 meters by the end of the century, or more than double that predicted by the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change's Fourth Assessment Report from 2007. “This is alarming”, says SWIPA chairman Morten Skovgård Olsen (Danish Ministry for Climate and Energy, Copenhagen, Denmark). “The SWIPA report documents how all parts of the Arctic cryosphere are changing, and scientists have been surprised by the speed of the changes.” Surface meltwater disappears down a moulin on the Greenland Ice Sheet. The SWIPA report records changes and trends since a previous 2004–2005 assessment. Among these is a doubling in the speed of some glaciers feeding into the ocean along the Greenland Ice Sheet's front, according to geophysicist Dorthe Dahl-Jensen (Centre for Ice and Climate, University of Copenhagen, Denmark) and a SWIPA author. “The fastest of these are moving as much as 30 meters a day.” Fully 60% of mass losses from the Greenland Ice Sheet come from icebergs that drop off these glacial tongues; but whether this process will accelerate, and by how much, is difficult to forecast because there is no large predictive model for ice sheets, she explains. “We need to boost the tools we have, to predict what the ice sheets will do in the future.” Ecologist Terry Callaghan (Royal Swedish Academy of Sciences, Stockholm, Sweden), another SWIPA author, remarked on the rapidity of change documented therein. “Things are happening much faster than expected.” The accelerated change is partly due to feedback mechanisms that further amplify global warming, such as an earlier snowmelt that results in greater surface heat absorption and higher spring temperatures. Callaghan also noted that several of the ecological changes recorded are counterintuitive, including a southward or down-slope movement of the tree line in some areas, due to smaller snow packs that melt earlier. This, in turn, results in summertime soil moisture stress that ultimately kills the trees. The renewable-energy industry in the Australian state of Victoria has suffered a serious setback under new rules to restrict wind farms and slash tariffs paid to households feeding solar power into the electricity grid. The conservative State Government has introduced new planning laws to stop wind turbines from being built within 2 km of homes unless owners agree, and 5 km of large regional towns. Wind farms are also now banned altogether in several tourism regions, including some of the country's windiest coasts. The move delivers on an election promise last November to voters concerned about negative visual impacts and alleged health effects from associated noise and vibration. Victoria's Planning Minister Matthew Guy (Melbourne, Victoria) said it was important that wind energy did not develop to the detriment of rural Victorians, but critics argued that the restrictions were arbitrary and without scientific foundation, and meant that more than half the future wind farms proposed would now not be built. In the same week, the State announced that tariffs paid to Victorian homeowners feeding solar-generated power into the national electricity grid would be more than halved. It was claimed that solar-power systems cost about 50% less than when the tariff scheme started in 2009, reducing the need for high incentives to encourage households to install panels. According to Russell Marsh (Clean Energy Council, Melbourne), the falling costs meant the industry was unlikely to require support by 2020. “But we are not there yet, and the right support is crucial to ensure the industry remains intact to deliver clean energy, emissions cuts, and jobs.” Mark Wakeham (Environment Victoria, Melbourne) sees the wind and solar decisions as economically damaging. “It appears that the only plan the new government has on climate change is to ensure Victoria misses out on the clean-energy investment boom. It's now harder to build a wind farm than a new coal mine or coal-fired power station in Victoria.” The changes came as the Australian Government prepares legislation to establish a national emissions-trading scheme. The scheme is strongly opposed by conservative politicians, fossil-fuel companies, and energy-intensive industries, despite a generous compensation package. Since the 1950s, the US Forest Service (USFS) has relied on fire-retardant chemicals as one method of battling wildland blazes, primarily in the American West. From 2000 to 2010, over 340 million liters of ammonium-phosphate-based retardant were dropped via aircraft over public forestlands. During the past decade, however, this policy has triggered considerable controversy because of the danger of aviation accidents and the environmental risks posed by the chemicals. In 2004, the Forest Service Employees for Environmental Ethics (FSEEE; Eugene, OR) sued the USFS over its use of retardants, which prompted a federal court to order the agency to conduct an environmental analysis of the practice. The conclusion that retardants cause no significant impacts provoked further court action, and last year a federal judge directed the USFS to produce a more detailed environmental impact statement (EIS). The draft EIS, released in May 2011, proposes the continued use of aerial spraying, albeit with revised guidelines to address wildlife concerns. In a public statement, USFS Chief Tom Tidwell (Washington, DC) said, “Research and experience demonstrate that aerially applied fire retardant, used in an appropriate manner, reduces wildfire intensity and the rate of spread, which increases the effectiveness of our fire suppression efforts on the ground”. Says FSEEE Director Andy Stahl, “There is simply no scientific evidence in the draft EIS that retardant improves initial attack success rates [preventing fires from spreading to ~120 hectares or less], diminishes average fire size, or lessens property loss. While anecdotal reports suggest it may affect fire outcomes, other reports suggest no beneficial effect”. The US Fish and Wildlife Service and National Marine Fisheries Service have identified 61 protected species that could be jeopardized by exposure to retardant. “If it enters a water body, ammonia is released, potentially poisoning miles of aquatic habitat”, Stahl contends. And rain that falls on retardant-treated land releases nutrients that can benefit invasive plants competing with threatened species, he says. Except in extraordinary circumstances, aerial drops are prohibited within a ~90-meter buffer around waterways, according to USFS spokesman Glen Stein (Ogden, UT). USFS data show that in 2010, retardant contaminated waterways and/or protected habitat in only 21 instances (out of nearly 8000 aerial drops). To better protect sensitive terrestrial species, USFS is developing maps identifying “avoidance areas” for inclusion in policy guidelines, Stein says. A final decision on fire retardant policy, which will apply to all federally managed lands, is due by the year's end. Massive die-offs of Italian cypresses from Portugal to Greece have been linked to California's Monterey cypresses (Cupressus macrocarpa), solving a long-standing puzzle in the world of plant pathology and surprising researchers. “When I was a student, this was one of the big mysteries”, says study co-author Matteo Garbelotto of the University of California, Berkeley. “The cypress canker epidemic was first seen in California in the 1920s – 100% of the Monterey cypresses in several San Joaquin Valley sites suddenly died – so the most credible theory was that the pathogen was exotic here”, he explains. Identified as the fungus Seiridium cardinale early on, the pathogen has since hit Europe, Africa, Asia, Australia, New Zealand, and South America, killing up to 95% of native cypresses, cedars, and junipers locally. Genetic analysis of S cardinale from the Mediterranean, the Southern Hemisphere, and California pointed to the last as the source. Whereas the Mediterranean samples were clones, the California samples were genetically diverse. Moreover, there are two distinct genetic variants of the fungus in California, but only the first was found in the Mediterranean and only the second was detected in the Southern Hemisphere in this study, which appeared online in August in Phytopathology (2011; doi: 10.1094/PHYTO-05-11-0144). International trade in Monterey cypresses caused a canker disease pandemic. Garbelotto attributes the initial California epidemic to the fact that the Monterey cypresses were planted “out of place” – not in their cool, coastal native range, but in the hot interior of the state. “We know they don't belong there”, Garbelotto points out. Indeed, S cardinale is largely benign in cool areas but causes cankers in hot areas, which is where Italy's native cypresses grow best. Monterey cypresses were popular in Italy beginning in the 1920s, and eyewitness accounts put the start of the canker epidemic there in the 1930s. Canker-resistant cypresses have now been developed in Europe. However, even these would be vulnerable to California's second genetic variant, making testing cypress imports a priority. “Legally, they can't be regulated because the pathogen species is in both continents – the law doesn't account for genetic variants”, Garbelotto explains. “But before, we didn't know what to look for and now we do.” Twelve years ago, in an effort to save young salmon (Oncorhynchus spp) from predation, the US Federal Government moved the world's largest colony of Caspian terns (Hydroprogne caspia) ~25 km down the Columbia River to East Sand Island, a low-lying island near the river's mouth. The terns' consumption of salmon smolts decreased – from roughly 74% to 30% of their diet – as they switched to anchovies and herring. But the smolts still aren't safe. Large numbers of double-crested cormorants (Phalacrocorax auritus) – bigger birds, able to eat five times as many fish than the terns – also moved to East Sand Island, devouring about 19 million smolts in 2010 alone. East Sand Island is now so densely settled with birds that predators, including eagles and gulls, have turned the tables, at least on the terns. Not a single tern chick was raised this year, while the cormorants continued to slurp smolts. A Caspian tern (Hydroprogne caspia) carries home dinner. It is unclear why the eagles shifted their attention to terns, but researchers suspect climate change is somehow involved. For example, the late, heavy snowpack flushed the estuary with fresh water, probably lowering the number of marine forage fish. “There is an aspect of global climate change that hasn't been fully appreciated, and that's the global ‘weirding’ factor – an increase in the variance of everything from snowpack to oceanic upwelling”, explains Daniel Roby, a wildlife biologist at Oregon State University (Corvallis, OR). Species management has never been predictable in its effects, but Roby admits that the uncertainties associated with global weirding have made him more circumspect about predicting the future. Instead, uncertainties need to be accounted for in management plans. “It's about bet-hedging”, he admits. He uses the existing science to recommend actions that, at least, won't back managers into a corner – for example, turning to lethal control of bird populations to protect juvenile salmon. Gary Fredricks, a fisheries biologist at the National Marine Fisheries Service (Portland, OR), agrees but worries that “analysis paralysis” can stymie actions needed to protect salmon. “We have to do the best we can with the existing data to save species the same he this year's tern it that the bird on East Sand Island some of which is to be a of management being developed could potentially help bird and an is a so we need to A new from the US the Government that or – which in climate – do not a to global “We are not at a of to the global climate Chief at the (Washington, The report, Climate and that to cool the by from the or reducing solar were on a the – from the and it – could be two from the – some such as of – and analysis to and In in current climate make it to the potential effects of such “The is because not at this explains. “It's The for a federally effort into climate to for the report also said that be accelerated by the of federal or the of a to also For example, some studies suggest that into the to in the and could increase or even a the probably not to do this – or admits a at the University of at “The of people on this at the is to understand what the and where there be people would that the only way this could a would be if the was may in over US billion in according to a study in Environment doi: a combination of and and and found between and are potentially significant to – up to says US of biologist and study (University of at As a plant State University, can be used to much than is with the US Environmental The of are in us to better in rural which is more to effects on Monitoring from may provide more to policy both and “We can and its impacts on health and food production in that have no which is the in developing with the policy of this more with the US decision to of is to a of the science that will in the of the in I did not support state and to a new that will be are the results from the 2010 study suggest that may have as much or more to by such a the of the scientists about the future of “The is to the initial observations to a and to more In 2011, the and the US a to and The support for the of management for regional and fisheries and trade the and use of tools to incentives for an of on and sustainable “This is the beginning of the end of comments for and Fisheries is both an environmental and an and accounts for nearly of global and more than 30% in is one of the most serious to American and global and as as to the health of the world's for the US National and “We will use all the tools at our to down on and from our of the tools being used is systems which can the and speed of and from data whether a is simply or is behavior that they are the number of both and fisheries that require is a of this according to Russell for International (Washington, is also to develop additional such as to provide greater of of that are not explains its off the of is also the of the into law in the in 2010, which the to have a as a of and global would help ensure there was no for from she says. years ago, the of species, other provides a coastal buffer and as a and for many Since however, has suffered population losses and has been as under the US Species an says an and from has since Since she has seen by and water temperatures. However, another cause of has been on the a disease known as or from first which can to the of the areas that disease on in the In a 2011; and whether the found in the and in is the factor of and S found in from different in the as as from genetic that the S was the same as found in The researchers healthy of in with the S found in samples and from The died within a that are a of the pathogen that causes The is that there is a and other researchers have many in the to from to more systems – that out potentially S The is to improved management efforts the where for water is more
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".