MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4247721044 · doi:10.33915/etd.236

Simulation of Multi-Component Gas Flow and Condensation in Marcellus Shale Reservoir

2013· dissertation· en· W4247721044 on OpenAlexfundno aff
Abdallah Elamin

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typedissertation
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicHydrocarbon exploration and reservoir analysis
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersCanadian Bureau for International Education
KeywordsOil shalePetroleum engineeringHydraulic fracturingNatural gasSaturation (graph theory)Unconventional oilReservoir simulationDry gasCondensationShale oilEnvironmental scienceGeologyChemistryWaste managementEngineeringGeographyMeteorology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The Marcellus shale formation, with more than 463 trillion cubic feet (Tcf) of recoverable gas in Pennsylvania and West Virginia, will play a critical role in providing clean energy, environmental sustainability, and increased security for our nation. However, due to recent low gas prices, most of the operating companies have slowed down their activities in dry gas areas and refocused their attention in oil and condensate production from liquid-rich regions. This change in production plans requires detailed investigation of gas condensate bank developments and saturation dynamics in shale gas reservoirs that change greatly with reservoir conditions. An advanced level of understanding of the parameters affecting gas condensate phase behavior is necessary in order to make accurate predictions of these changes.;One of these parameters is the phase behavior of gas condensate in shale gas reservoirs that is significantly different than that of gas condensate as bulk in the PVT cell. It is highly affected by shale pore size distribution, gas adsorption, and water vapor saturation. Critical properties of gas condensate are also significantly influenced by shale pore size distribution, leading to changes in viscosity and formation volume calculations. In addition to that fluid composition, natural and hydraulic fractures, reservoir anisotropy, rock compressibility and number of horizontal wells and their operating conditions could also significantly impact the condensate bank development and dynamics. To quantify the importance of each one of these parameters and their interactions on dynamics of condensate bank development, an experimental design technique, Plackett-Burman design, will be practiced for two different cases (single well cylindrical model and actual Marcellus shale gas reservoir with heterogeneous porosity and permeability field). Detailed uncertainty analysis of different parameters has a significant impact on implementing the best production strategies such as bottom-hole pressures and hydraulic fracture spacing. Commercial simulators are unable to provide reliable predictions of condensate production rates and saturation dynamics due to lack of correct physics controlling production mechanisms in shale gas reservoirs.;In this study we will introduce a new equation of state, including the cohesive and adhesive forces due to fluid-fluid and fluid-solid interactions, and use that to develop a compositional model for gas condensate fluids in Marcellus shale gas reservoirs. A new correlation to adjust critical properties of gas condensate will also be developed based on shale pore size distribution to incorporate into the compositional simulator, CMG (GEM), to investigate the dynamics of gas condensation, and to perform sensitivity analysis on

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.042
Threshold uncertainty score0.084

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.019
GPT teacher head0.254
Teacher spread0.234 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations6
Published2013
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicHydrocarbon exploration and reservoir analysis→French-language works237,207→