MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4247724438 · doi:10.3138/ecf.23.1.163

“An Outlandish, Foreign-Made Englishman”: Aristocratic Oppression and Ethnic Anomaly in <i>Caleb Williams</i>

2010· article· en· W4247724438 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Charlie Bondhus

Bibliographic record

VenueEighteenth-Century Fiction · 2010
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicIrish and British Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSquireHonourIrishIdentity (music)OppressionAristocracy (class)ConformitySociologyLawClassicsHistoryPoliticsArtPhilosophyPolitical scienceAestheticsLinguistics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In William Godwin's novel Caleb Williams, the English Squire Falkland's decision to construct his identity in conformity with Italian honour codes not only debases his Englishness but also drives him to persecute his secretary Caleb Williams, who possesses a damning secret that could ruin the Squire's distinguished reputation. The embattled Caleb, who prides himself on his autonomy and English identity, is forced to disguise himself first as an Irish beggar and later as a Jewish peddler, facades that render him, like Falkland, an ethnically anomalous Englishman. The middle-class Caleb's ethnic destabilization at Falkland's hands suggests that Godwin, like many of his more conservative peers, is claiming that the continentally inflected malfeasance of the aristocracy corrupts the bourgeoisie in such a way that the very terms and privileges of Englishness are contested. In this way, Godwin's ostensible purpose of promoting a liberal model of human rights ultimately comes at the cost of reifying xenophobic fears about Italians, Jews, and the Irish.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.095
Threshold uncertainty score0.189

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0140.026
Scholarly communication0.0040.002
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0010.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.284
Teacher spread0.273 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2010
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueEighteenth-Century FictionSame topicIrish and British StudiesFrench-language works237,207