Le paradoxe extraterritorial au cœur des territoires mondialisés. Le cas de la zone économique spéciale d'Aqaba, Jordanie
Bibliographic record
Abstract
La dimension extraterritoriale semble constituer aujourd'hui un élément incontournable dans l'analyse des modalités de construction de certains territoires perçus comme des espaces hautement stratégiques de la mondialisation économique. Phénomène au cœur de représentations sociales de l'espace, il met surtout en lumière des processus de construction territoriale ex-nihilo se trouvant en rupture des configurations socio-spatiales préexistantes. L'extraterritorialité est souvent évoquée dans l'appréhension de certaines modalités de « fabrique de la ville » (politique des grands projets dans les grandes métropoles arabes) comme dans l'étude de hauts lieux de la mondialisation économique à l'image des zones franches. Cet article tente, à travers l'exemple de la zone économique spéciale d'Aqaba en Jordanie, de rendre compte de l'existence de différentes dimensions extraterritoriales et s'attache à en révéler leurs manifestations, les modalités d'ancrage ainsi que leur articulation sur le territoire hôte.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.007 | 0.018 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.008 | 0.005 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.008 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.008 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".