Parents and Adolescents Co-Constructing Career
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Parents and adolescents co-construct career through joint projects that focus on the adolescent’s future. This co-construction of career is conceptualized within an action theoretical framework which examines the joint, goal-directed actions that parents and adolescents take together. This framework allows the process of career construction to be unpacked. Based on over 10 years of research with various family groups, using the action-project method, the family career-development project is discussed as having meaning for parents and adolescents, and as being goal-directed and complex. These projects are interwoven with other projects in the parents’ and adolescents’ lives, including social inclusion, culture, and the parentadolescent relationship. Specific successive steps where there is positive feedback and the experience of success characterized projects that worked well. The projects are energized by emotion. Specific behaviours, including the agentic use of language, and structural resources, such as time availability, influence how the projects are carried out. This understanding has implications for practice by directing the focus of attention on joint projects in which the adolescent is engaged, particularly with their parents.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.005 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".